Rodica v. Estee Lauder Companies
| Mary Joanne Rodica |
| Estee Lauder Companies d/b/a Aveda and Estee Lauder Companies |
| 1:2019cv08275 |
| December 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing held and continued to 2/27/2020 at 9:00 a.m.. In the interest of efficient case management, the Court requests that counsel file on the docket no less than 3 business days before the next status hearing and all further status hearings a brief joint status report. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 1/28/2020 at 9:30 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least three days prior to the initial status and all further status hearings. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mary Joanne Rodica by Michael T. Smith (Smith, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mary Joanne Rodica; Y. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16546609. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Smith, Michael) (Document has incorrect case number) Modified on 12/20/2019 (ph, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Estee Lauder Companies d/b/a Aveda (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
