Medina v. Saul
| Adrian Medina |
| Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2019cv08324 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Young B Kim |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government is directed to file the administrative record by February 28, 2020. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by April 30, 2020. The government's response and/or cross- motion for summary judgment is due by June 30, 2020. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, he may file a reply brief by July 14, 2020, but one is not required. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. Mailed notice (ma,) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Virginia M. Kendall no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/28/2020. (sxb, )
|
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Heffron, Scott) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing and remanding the decision subject to review is due 60 days after administrative record is filed. The Commissioner's motion to affirm the decision and brief in support thereof are due 45 days after Plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after the Commissioner's brief is filed. Parties are encouraged to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge in order receive expeditious ruling on the matter due to the significant caseload of the District Court. Parties are to meet and confer by 1/17/2020 to discuss whether they jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Adrian Medina by Justin Roger Poh (Poh, Justin) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Adrian Medina by Joseph Stephen Sellers (Sellers, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Adrian Medina by Deborah Susan Spector (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adrian Medina; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16552784.(Spector, Deborah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
