Bordelais v. Kuhn et al
| Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais |
| Kuhn Counseling Center, P.C. and Maria E. J. Kuhn |
| 1:2019cv08348 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
COMPLAINT filed by Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais. (smm, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 , #8 is granted. The Court has conducted an initial review of Plaintiff's complaint and determined that it satis-fies the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint; (2) issue summonses for service of the com-plaint on Defendants; and (3) mail Plaintiff a copy of this order, as well as two blank USM285 (Marshals service) forms. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to serve Defend-ant but will not attempt service until Plaintiff returns the completed USM285 ser-vice forms. Plaintiff must return the completed USM285 forms to the Clerk of Court by March 6, 2020. His failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case for lack of prosecution. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 2/7/2020. Mailed notice (smm, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued to U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants Maria E. J. Kuhn, Kuhn Counseling Center, P.C. (smm, )
|
|
MAILED Copy of Order dated 2/7/20 and two blank USM-285 (Marshals service) forms to Plaintiff Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais. (smm, )
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #8 is taken under advisement. Motion hearing set for 2/13/20 is stricken. The Court will rule by mail. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Motion by Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief #8 before Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 2/13/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Bordelais, Antoine)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION by Plaintiff Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais for Permission to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Bordelais, Antoine)
|
|
Filing 7
FINANCIAL Affidavit (Bordelais, Antoine)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, )
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm, )
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais. (smm, )
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Antoine Guy Jean Paul Bordelais. (smm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
