Carmona v. T&L Produce, Inc. et al
| Gilberto Carmona |
| George Tsekos, T&L Produce, Inc. d/b/a Roins Food Distribution, Bellissimo Distribution, LLC d/b/a Greco & Sons, T&L Produce, Inc. and Bellissimo Distribution |
| 1:2019cv08377 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 (JOINT MOTION) NOTICE of Motion by Kevin William Frey for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #12 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 2/20/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Frey, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Bellissimo Distribution, T&L Produce, Inc., George Tsekos for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or Other Responsive Pleading (JOINT MOTION) (Frey, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Bellissimo Distribution by Kevin William Frey (Frey, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Gilberto Carmona. George Tsekos waiver sent on 12/23/2019, answer due 2/21/2020. (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Gilberto Carmona. T&L Produce, Inc. waiver sent on 12/23/2019, answer due 2/21/2020. (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Gilberto Carmona. Bellissimo Distribution waiver sent on 12/23/2019, answer due 2/21/2020. (Gorman, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 2/20/20 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gilberto Carmona by Max Phillip Barack (Barack, Max) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gilberto Carmona by Dennis Ray Favaro (Favaro, Dennis) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gorman, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gilberto Carmona by Patrick John Gorman (Gorman, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gilberto Carmona; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16556973.(Gorman, Patrick) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
