Gomez v. Rihani et al
| Felipe Gomez |
| J. Kaminski, City Of Chicago, C.A. Stenzal, J. Atamian, Det. Corral, Steve Rihani, Village Of Schaumburg and H. Guiterrez |
| 1:2019cv08437 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendants' second unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #18 is granted from 02/17/2020 to 03/06/2020. Initial status hearing set for 03/13/2020 to stand. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 19 Unopposed NOTICE of Motion by Maxwell Evan Lisy for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #18 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 2/24/2020 at 08:30 AM. (Lisy, Maxwell) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Lisy, Maxwell) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Det. Corral, Steve Rihani, C.A. Stenzal by Victoria Rose Benson (Benson, Victoria) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Counsel for Defendant contacted the courtroom deputy to request continuance of the 02/12/2020 status hearing as the City of Chicago Law Department will be closed for Lincoln's birthday. City of Chicago Defendants' unopposed motion to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint #14 is granted to and including 02/17/2020. Initial status hearing of 02/12/2020 is reset to 03/13/2020 at 8:30 a.m., without objection by Plaintiff, with the joint initial status report due three business days in advance of the new hearing date. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Elizabeth Kathryn Hanford for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #14 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 2/10/2020 at 08:30 AM. (Hanford, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendants Det. Corral, Steve Rihani, C.A. Stenzal for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead (unopposed)(joint with City) (Hanford, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Det. Corral, Steve Rihani, C.A. Stenzal by Elizabeth Kathryn Hanford (Hanford, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Det. Corral, Steve Rihani, C.A. Stenzal by Emily Elizabeth Dory (Dory, Emily) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants J. Atamian, J. Kaminski, Village Of Schaumburg by Lance C. Malina (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Malina, Lance) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants J. Atamian, J. Kaminski, Village Of Schaumburg by Anthony George Becknek (Becknek, Anthony) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Village Of Schaumburg. (Becknek, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Village Of Schaumburg. (Becknek, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Village Of Schaumburg by Anthony George Becknek (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Becknek, Anthony) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 02/12/2020 at 9:00 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: An audit was performed on cases filed that allege violation of civil rights by a prisoner or former prisoner. Based on this review, this matter is more properly designated as a Nature of Suit 550 (Civil Rights). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to change the Nature of Suit to 550. No further action is needed by the parties. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Felipe Gomez by Anthony J. Peraica (Peraica, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Peraica, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Felipe Gomez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16565581.(Peraica, Anthony) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
