Jensen v. MAT Holdings, Inc.
| Kristin Jensen |
| MAT Holdings, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv08481 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Kristin Jensen. MAT Holdings, Inc. waiver sent on 12/30/2019, answer due 2/28/2020. (Salvatore, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Initial status hearing is set for 3/10/20 at 8:30 a.m. No later than five business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kristin Jensen by Sarah Losh Bakker (Bakker, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Salvatore, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kristin Jensen; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16570184.(Salvatore, Jennifer) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant MAT Holdings, Inc. (txl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jensen v. MAT Holdings, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kristin Jensen | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Losh Bakker |
| Represented By: | Jennifer B. Salvatore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MAT Holdings, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
