Pryor et al v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Pryor et al v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. et al

Pryor et al v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr., Nathaniel Pryor, RUSH-COPLEY MEDICAL GROUP NFP and Candence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:	Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., M.D. HINNA KHAN and Hinna Khan
Case Number:	1:2019cv08496
Filed:	December 30, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge:	Edmond E Chang
Referring Judge:	Franklin U Valderrama
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Jury Demanded By:	Both

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
July 7, 2023	Filing 192 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is the parties' joint status report on the status of settlement #191 , which informs the Court that the parties need additional time to finalize the settlement and requesting an additional two weeks. Pursuant to the parties' request, on or before 7/20/2023, the parties are directed to submit a petition to approve the settlement or a status report on the status of settlement. Emailed notice (axc).
July 6, 2023	Filing 191 STATUS Report on Settlement by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) (Patterson, Matthew)
June 26, 2023	Filing 190 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The parties have notified the Court that this case has settled in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court strikes all pretrial and trial hearings and deadlines. The Court orders the parties to file a proposed dismissal order, or status report on the status of settlement, no later than 07/06/2023. Emailed notice (axc).
June 23, 2023	Filing 189 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court thanks Magistrate Judge Kim for convening the settlement conference. All pretrial and trial deadlines remain as previously scheduled. Emailed notice (axc).
June 22, 2023	Filing 188 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Judge Honorable Young B. Kim no longer referred to the case.Mailed notice
June 22, 2023	Filing 187 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Settlement conference held. Parties made progress but they were unable to resolve the case. Parties should reach out to this court by phone or email if they wish to explore different settlement options. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is returned to the assigned District Judge. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
June 20, 2023	Filing 186 REPLY by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Reply Brief In Support of Its Motion For Partial Reconsideration (Kaminski, Matthew)
June 16, 2023	Filing 185 RESPONSE by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually)in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. for reconsideration regarding memorandum opinion and order #153 Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of The Court's Summary Judgment Memora #176 (Patterson, Matthew)
June 12, 2023	Filing 184 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: At Plaintiffs' request, the settlement conference scheduled for June 22, 2023, will take place by video. The court will generate a video link for Webex conference and email the same to the parties in advance of the settlement conference. Mailed notice (ec)
June 10, 2023	Filing 183 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: An in-person settlement conference is scheduled for June 22, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom 1019. The individuals with the authority to settle this matter must appear in person. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
June 9, 2023	Filing 182 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Young B. Kim for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: settlement conference. Mailed notice. (kp, )
June 9, 2023	Filing 181 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed the parties' joint status report regarding a settlement conference #179 . Based on the joint status report, the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Kim for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Mailed notice. (kp, )
June 9, 2023	Filing 180 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center's motion for reconsideration #176 . The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiffs' response due 06/16/2023 and Rush's reply due 06/20/2023. Mailed notice. (kp, )
June 9, 2023	Filing 179 STATUS Report RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (JOINT) by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) (Patterson, Matthew)
June 8, 2023	Filing 178 PRETRIAL Memorandum (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Agreed Voir Dire, #2 Exhibit Disputed Voir Dire, #3 Exhibit Pltfs' JIs w Defs' objs, #4 Exhibit Def Hosp's JIs w Pltfs' objs, #5 Exhibit Def Khan's JIs w Pltfs' objs)(Patterson, Matthew)
June 8, 2023	Filing 177 SUPPLEMENT to pretrial memorandum #160 Dr. Khan's Amended Pre-Trial Statement and Objections (Smit, Monica)
June 8, 2023	Filing 176 MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. for reconsideration regarding memorandum opinion and order #153 Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of The Court's Summary Judgment Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF No. 153] Regarding Decision Not To Address Defendant's Argument For Summary Judgment on Apparent Agency Claim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - IPI Actual Agency Jury Instructions, #2 Exhibit B - IPI Apparent Agency Jury Instructions)(Kaminski, Matthew)
June 7, 2023	Filing 175 SUPPLEMENT to text entry,,,, #172 Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Amended Pre-Trial Statement and Objections (Kaminski, Matthew)
June 7, 2023	Filing 174 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court is in receipt of the settlement letters from the parties. The Court orders the parties to file a joint status report by 06/09/2023 at noon regarding whether the parties unanimously consent to a settlement conference. While the Court is not commenting on the strength or weakness of any claims or defenses in this case, the Court strongly encourages the parties to consider agreeing to a settlement conference. Mailed notice. (kp, )
June 6, 2023	Filing 173 SUPPLEMENT to supplement #156 , text entry,,,, #172 Pltfs' Pre-Trial Statement - Amended (Patterson, Matthew)
June 2, 2023	Filing 172 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: In their Pre-Trial Statement, Plaintiffs failed to comply with the Court's Standing Order Governing Civil Jury Trials by not numbering their Exhibits, and not including a "Date" or "Relevance" column within their Exhibit chart. Plaintiffs must file an amended Pre-Trial Statement amending the Exhibit chart only to correct these omissions by 06/06/2023 at 12:00 p.m. Plaintiffs must include a description of the relevance of the offered Exhibit in the chart. Based upon the amended Exhibit chart, Defendants may submit amended objections to Plaintiffs' Exhibit chart by 06/08/2023 at 12:00 p.m. In addition to filing the amended Exhibit chart and objections, the Court requires the parties to submit the Word versions of the Exhibit chart with their objections to the Court's proposed order inbox Proposed_Order_Valderrama@ilnd.uscourts.gov consistent with the Court's Standing Order. The Court reminds the parties to strictly comply with the Court's Standing Order. Mailed notice (ags)
June 2, 2023	Filing 171 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The pre-trial conference scheduled for 06/27/2023 at 9:30 a.m. will be in-person in Courtroom 1941. The Court resets the deadline for the parties to provide a USB Key/thumb drive and hard copies of objected-to exhibits and deposition transcripts from 06/08/2023 to 06/06/2023. If the advanced deadline will present an unreasonable hardship for either party, the party should notify the Court's courtroom deputy. All other dates and deadlines remain as scheduled. Mailed notice (ags)
June 1, 2023	Filing 170 RESPONSE by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor to motion in limine, #165 to Defendant Hospital's Omnibus Motions in Limine (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Patterson, Matthew)
June 1, 2023	Filing 169 SUPPLEMENT to supplement #164 Pltfs' Objections to Defendant Hospital's Pre-Trial Statement (Patterson, Matthew)
June 1, 2023	Filing 168 RESPONSE by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor to motion in limine #161 to Defendant Khan's Omnibus Motions in Limine (Patterson, Matthew)
June 1, 2023	Filing 167 SUPPLEMENT to pretrial memorandum #160 Plaintiffs' objections (Patterson, Matthew)
May 25, 2023	Filing 166 ANSWER to amended complaint Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint by Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc.(Kaminski, Matthew)
May 25, 2023	Filing 165 MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc.in limine Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Motions In Limine (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(Kaminski, Matthew)
May 25, 2023	Filing 164 SUPPLEMENT to Defendant's Pre-Trial Statement And Objections (Kaminski, Matthew)
May 25, 2023	Filing 163 RESPONSE by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. Rush Copley-Medical Center Inc's Response to Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motions in Limine (ECF No. 157) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 2.18.22 Email to Plaintiffs, #2 Exhibit 2 - Dr. Duchowny's Rule 26(a)(2) Report, #3 Exhibit 3 - Dr. Duchowny's Testimonial History, #4 Exhibit 4 - 3.24.22 Email to Plaintiffs, #5 Exhibit 5 - 3.28.22 Email to Plaintiffs, #6 Exhibit 6 - Dr. Duchowny's Deposition, #7 Exhibit 7 - Dr. Duchowny's Testimonial History Updated, #8 Exhibit 8 - Dr. Davis's Deposition, #9 Exhibit 9 - Dr. Meyer's Rule 26(a)(2) Report, #10 Exhibit 10 - Pryor Sr.'s Criminal History, #11 Exhibit 11 - Dr. Milunsky's Deposition, #12 Exhibit 12 - Part 1 of Dr. Sholas's Deposition, #13 Exhibit 13 - Part II of Dr. Sholas's Deposition)(Kaminski, Matthew)
May 25, 2023	Filing 162 MOTION by Defendant Hinna Khanin limine Response to Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine (Smit, Monica)
May 25, 2023	Filing 161 MOTION by Defendant Hinna Khanin limine Dr. Khan's Motions in Limine (Smit, Monica)
May 25, 2023	Filing 160 PRETRIAL Memorandum (Smit, Monica)
May 25, 2023	Filing 159 Dr. Hinna Khan's Answer to Second Amended Complaint at Law for Damages ANSWER to amended complaint by Hinna Khan(Smit, Monica)
May 22, 2023	Filing 158 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court, sua sponte, sets the following schedule for the exchange of settlement letters. The Court will review the settlement position papers from the parties and determine whether to schedule a settlement conference. Plaintiffs' demand letter is to be provided to opposing counsel and the Court's proposed order inbox, Proposed_Order_Valderrama@ilnd.uscourts.gov, by 05/30/2023. Defendants' offer letter is to be provided to opposing counsel and the Court's proposed order inbox by 6/6/2023. The parties must review and comply with the Court's Standing Order Governing Settlement Conferences with respect to their settlement letters. Each settlement letter is limited to 5 pages. Settlement letters should not be filed on the docket. All other dates and deadlines remain as scheduled. Mailed notice. (exr, )
May 18, 2023	Filing 157 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryorin limine (Pltfs' Omnibus MILs) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Patterson, Matthew)
May 18, 2023	Filing 156 SUPPLEMENT to Pre-Trial Statement (Pltfs' Portion) (Patterson, Matthew)
May 16, 2023	Filing 155 ORDER: For the reasons in the accompanying Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude #123 ,and denies Rush Hospital's Motion to Exclude #120 . Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 5/16/2023. Emailed notice (axc).
May 11, 2023	Filing 154 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court, sua sponte, modifies the Pre-Trial Order #113 #151 as follows: Plaintiffs' pre-trial statement is due 05/18/2023; Defendants' pre-trial statement and objections are due 05/25/2023; Plaintiffs' pre-trial objections are due 06/01/2023; the parties' jointly prepared final pre-trial memorandum is due 06/08/2023; a USB Key/thumb drive and hard copies of objected-to exhibits and deposition transcripts are due 06/08/2023. All other dates and deadlines remain as scheduled. Mailed notice (mjc, )
May 11, 2023	Filing 153 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 5/11/2023.Mailed notice(mjc, )
May 11, 2023	Filing 152 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. (Rush Hospital) and Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP's (Rush Medical Group) motion for partial summary judgment #121 . The Court denies summary judgment for Rush Hospital with respect to the actual and apparent agency claims for Dr. Khan in Counts I and IV of the Second Amended Complaint. The Court grants summary judgment in favor of Rush Medical Group and against Plaintiffs for Counts III and IV of the Second Amended Complaint, and Rush Medical Group is terminated from this case. The Court observes from the docket that Defendants have not answered the Second Amended Complaint (R. 48). The remaining Defendants, Rush Hospital and Dr. Hinna Khan, are ordered to file their respective Answers to the Second Amended Complaint by 05/25/2023. Mailed notice (mjc, )
May 3, 2023	Filing 151 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court, sua sponte, modifies the Pre-Trial Order #113 as follows: Plaintiffs' pre-trial statement is due 05/16/2023; Defendants' pre-trial statement and objections are due 05/23/2023; Plaintiffs' pre-trial objections are due 05/30/2023; the parties' jointly prepared final pre-trial memorandum is due 06/06/2023; a USB Key/thumb drive and hard copies of objected-to exhibits and deposition transcripts are due 06/06/2023. All other dates and deadlines remain as scheduled. Emailed notice (axc).
April 21, 2023	Filing 150 AMENDED reply to response to motion, #141 Amended Doc 141-4 (Patterson, Matthew)
April 20, 2023	Filing 149 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: It appears that the full document intended to be attached as Exhibit D to Plaintiff's Reply in support of their Daubert motion was omitted, as the Exhibit attached thereto is only one page [141-4]. Plaintiff is instructed to file the full exhibit by 12:00 p.m. on 4/21/2023. Emailed notice (axc).
November 22, 2022	Filing 148 AMENDED response in opposition to motion,, #131 (Amended Exhibit 131-5) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit notarized affidavit)(Patterson, Matthew)
November 10, 2022	Filing 147 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court grants Defendants' unopposed motion to confirm filings #146 . The Court has received and accepted Defendants' filings. Mailed notice (axc).
November 9, 2022	Filing 146 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to clarify Unopposed Defendants' Motion To Clarify And Confirm That Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' L.R. 56.1(b)(3) Statement of Additional Material Facts (Dkt. 144) and Defendants' Exhibits in Support of its Response (Dkt. 145) Are Accepted By The Court, or, Alternatively, Motion for Extension of Time Through and Including November 8, 2022 (Kaminski, Matthew)
November 8, 2022	Filing 145 APPENDIX Rule 56 statement #144 Defendants' Table of Contents and Exhibits to Its Response [Dkt. 144] to Plaintiffs' Statement of Additional Material Facts (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dr. Ed Pont's Expert Disclosure, #2 Exhibit B - RCMC's Answers to Plaintiff's Interrogatories)(Kaminski, Matthew)
November 8, 2022	Filing 144 RULE 56 Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Additional Material Facts Statement (Kaminski, Matthew)
November 7, 2022	Filing 143 REPLY by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP (Kaminski, Matthew)
November 7, 2022	Filing 142 REPLY by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. to motion to bar, #120 Defendant's Reply In Support of Its Motion to Bar Dr. Thomson [Dkt. 120] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Dr. Thomson's Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B - Economics Journal, #3 Exhibit C - Dr. Thomson's Deposition Transcript, #4 Exhibit D - Dr. Thomson's Econometrics & Employment Research Report, #5 Exhibit E - Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction (IPI) 34.01, #6 Exhibit F - U.S. Census Table)(Kaminski, Matthew)
November 7, 2022	Filing 141 REPLY by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) to response to motion,, #130 , MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel PryorExclude Genetics or for a Daubert Hearing #123 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Patterson, Matthew)
October 25, 2022	Filing 140 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reason stated in the motion, the Court grants the Unopposed Defendants' Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc. and Rush-Copley Medical Group Nfp's Motion to Extend Reply Brief Deadlines #139 . The briefing schedule entered on 9/20/022 #126 is modified as followed: The deadline for the parties' replies to summary judgment and Daubert motions is extended to 11/07/2022. Mailed notice (axc).
October 24, 2022	Filing 139 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for extension of time to file response/reply as to order on motion for extension of time to file response/reply,, text entry,, order on motion for relief, #126 Defendants' Unopposed Motion To Extend Reply Brief Deadlines By 14 Days (Kaminski, Matthew)
October 14, 2022	Filing 138 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Defendants' unopposed motion for leave to file under seal #137 . Defendants have leave to file certain pages, as spelled out in the motion, under seal. Mailed notice (axc).
October 12, 2022	Filing 137 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to seal Amended Motion For Leave To File Under Seal Certain Pages of Minor Plaintiff's Medical Record Cited in Defendants' Response Brief [Dkt. 130] To Plaintiff's Motion to Bar (Kaminski, Matthew)
October 12, 2022	Filing 136 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court denies Defendants' motion to seal #135 without prejudice because Defendants have failed to indicate in the title and the body of the motion whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, "[b]efore filing a motion, the movant's counsel must ask opposing counsel whether there is an objection to the motion. Whether the motion is opposed or unopposed should be so identified in the title and body of the motion." By 10/14/2022, Defendants may file another motion to seal, and in that motion Defendants must indicate in the title and the body of the motion whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Mailed notice (axc).
October 6, 2022	Filing 135 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to seal Motion For Leave To File Under Seal Certain Pages of Minor Plaintiff's Medical Record Cited in Defendants' Response Brief [Dkt. 130] To Plaintiff's Motion to Bar (Kaminski, Matthew)
October 5, 2022	Filing 134 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court denies Defendants' motion to seal #132 without prejudice because Defendants have failed to indicate in the title and the body of the motion whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, "[b]efore filing a motion, the movant's counsel must ask opposing counsel whether there is an objection to the motion. Whether the motion is opposed or unopposed should be so identified in the title and body of the motion." By 10/12/2022, Defendants may file another motion to seal, and in that motion Defendants must indicate in the title and the body of the motion whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Mailed notice (axc).
October 4, 2022	Filing 133 SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP Sealed Document: 2 Pages of Medical Record of Minor Plaintiff From Rush Copley Medical Center's Emergency Room Cited in Defendants' Response Brief [Dkt. 130] In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion To Bar (Kaminski, Matthew)
October 4, 2022	Filing 132 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to seal Motion For Leave To File Under Seal Certain Pages of Minor Plaintiff's Medical Record Cited in Defendants' Response Brief [Dkt. 130] To Plaintiff's Motion to Bar (Kaminski, Matthew)
October 4, 2022	Filing 131 RESPONSE by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually)in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. to bar Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Daubert Motion to Bar Plaintiff's Economist Expert Michael Thomson, Ph.D. #120 (Attachments: #1 Appendix Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9)(Timoney, Ryan)
October 4, 2022	Filing 130 RESPONSE by Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel PryorExclude Genetics or for a Daubert Hearing #123 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W)(Ennis, Matthew)
October 4, 2022	Filing 129 RULE 56 56.1(b)(3) Statement by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) regarding motion for summary judgment, #121 (Attachments: #1 Appendix Table of Contents of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 10)(Patterson, Matthew)
October 4, 2022	Filing 128 MEMORANDUM by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) in Opposition to motion for summary judgment, #121 (Patterson, Matthew)
October 4, 2022	Filing 127 RESPONSE by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually)in Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for summary judgment Defendants' Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc. and Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP's Motion for Summary Judgment #121 (Patterson, Matthew)
September 20, 2022	Filing 126 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants the Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule Deadlines Related to Summary Judgment and Daubert Motions #125 . The deadline for the parties' responses to summary judgment and Daubert motions is extended to 10/04/2022; the deadline for the parties' replies is extended to 10/25/2022. Mailed notice (axc).
September 16, 2022	Filing 125 MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply as to order on motion for leave to file,, text entry, #124 Agreed Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule for Daubert and Summary Judgment Responses and Replies (Kaminski, Matthew)
August 31, 2022	Filing 124 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed 15 Page Limit #119 . Plaintiffs' motion [119-1] is filed instanter. Defendants shall also have leave to exceed the page limit in their respective responses by 12 pages. Mailed notice (axc).
August 30, 2022	Filing 123 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel PryorExclude Genetics or for a Daubert Hearing (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W)(Patterson, Matthew)
August 30, 2022	Filing 122 RULE 56 Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Statement by Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP regarding motion for summary judgment, #121 Defendants' Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc. and Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP's Local Rule 56.1(a)(3) Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Adriana Madrigal's Deposition Transcript, #2 Exhibit B - Dr. Khan's Answers to Plaintiff's Interrogatories, #3 Exhibit C - Dr. Khan's Deposition Transcript, #4 Exhibit D - Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Answers to Plaintiff's Interrogatories, #5 Exhibit E - Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP's Answers to Plaintiff's Interrogatories, #6 Exhibit F - Ryan Asmus' Affidavit, #7 TABLE OF CONTENTS OF EXHIBITS)(Kaminski, Matthew)
August 30, 2022	Filing 121 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for summary judgment Defendants' Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc. and Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP's Motion for Summary Judgment (Kaminski, Matthew)
August 30, 2022	Filing 120 MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. to bar Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center Inc.'s Daubert Motion to Bar Plaintiff's Economist Expert Michael Thomson, Ph.D. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dr. Thomson's Reports, #2 Exhibit B - Dr. Bartlett's Report, #3 Exhibit C - Dr. Thomson's Deposition Transcript)(Kaminski, Matthew)
August 30, 2022	Filing 119 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for leave to file (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Patterson, Matthew)
July 25, 2022	Filing 118 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants the joint motion to extend deadlines for summary judgment and Daubert motions #117 . The Court extends the current deadlines as follows: the deadline for Daubert and summary judgment motions is extended to 08/30/2022; the deadline for responses is extended to 09/20/2022; and the deadline for replies is extended to 10/11/2022.. Mailed notice (axc).
July 22, 2022	Filing 117 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for extension of time to file Daubert and MSJ Motions (JOINT MOTION) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Timoney, Ryan)
June 13, 2022	Filing 116 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 12/8/21 before the Honorable Young B. Kim. Order Number: 43351. Court Reporter Contact Information: Kathleen_Fennell@ilnd.uscourts.gov. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 7/4/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/14/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/12/2022. (Fennell, Kathleen)
June 11, 2022	Filing 115 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: All discovery is now closed. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is returned to the assigned District Judge. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
May 31, 2022	Filing 114 NOTICE by Mark M. Burden of Change of Address (Burden, Mark)
May 26, 2022	Filing 113 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Telephonic status hearing held on 05/26/2022. For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Renewed Motion for Trial Date Certain #111 is granted. The Court sets the following trial schedule: trial to begin on 07/11/2023 at 9:00 a.m.; pre-trial conference on 06/27/2023 at 9:30 a.m.; Plaintiffs' pre-trial statement is due 05/09/2023; Defendants' pre-trial statement and objections are due 05/16/2023; Plaintiffs' pre-trial objections are due 05/23/2023; the parties' jointly-prepared final pre-trial memorandum is due 05/30/2023; a USB Key/thumb drive and hard copies of objected-to exhibits and deposition transcripts are due 05/30/2023; and a USB Key/thumb drive and hard copies of final trial exhibits following the Pre-Trial Conference are due 07/06/2023. The parties are reminded that due to the Northern District of Illinois COVID protocols, this trial schedule may need to be adjusted. The Court also enters the following briefing schedule, based on the agreement of the parties: Daubert motions and motions for summary judgment by 07/26/2022; responses by 08/16/2022; and replies by 09/06/2022. The Court encourages the parties to explore settlement, including a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Kim. Mailed notice (axc). Modified on 6/1/2022 (axc, ).
April 29, 2022	Filing 112 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: A status hearing is scheduled for 5/26/2022 at 2:30 p.m. At the status hearing, the parties should be prepared to discuss the Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Trial Date Certain (Unopposed) #111 . The call-in number is (888) 808-6929 and the access code is 5348076. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (axc).
April 27, 2022	Filing 111 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryorscheduling conference to set trial date (Patterson, Matthew)
March 9, 2022	Filing 110 STATUS Report Regarding Deposition by Hinna Khan (Smit, Monica)
February 27, 2022	Filing 109 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the joint status report, (R. 108), all expert discovery must be completed by June 10, 2022. This is a firm deadline. If the parties either change the deposition dates already confirmed or delay confirming certain depositions, they do so at their own peril. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
February 25, 2022	Filing 108 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP (Kaminski, Matthew)
February 15, 2022	Filing 107 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time #106 is granted. Defendants now have until March 15, 2022, to serve Dr. Maurice Sholas's Rule 26(a)(2) report on Plaintiffs. Mailed notice (ec)
February 15, 2022	Filing 106 MOTION by Defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for extension of time to Serve Dr. Maurice Sholas' Expert Report (Ennis, Matthew)
January 29, 2022	Filing 105 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendant Khan's unopposed motion for leave to disclose an expert #104 is granted. Dr. Khan is ordered to identify her expert in the joint status report due by February 25, 2022, and serve her Rule 26(a)(2) report by no later than March 25, 2022. The court's order of January 7, 2022, (R. #98 ), to stand. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
January 28, 2022	Filing 104 MOTION by Defendant Hinna Khan for leave to file Unopposed Motion to Disclose an Expert Witness (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smit, Monica)
January 20, 2022	Filing 103 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hinna Khan by Monica Lee Smit (Smit, Monica)
January 20, 2022	Filing 102 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hinna Khan by Joseph L Rourke (Rourke, Joseph)
January 20, 2022	Filing 101 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hinna Khan by Mark M. Burden (Burden, Mark)
January 19, 2022	Filing 100 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Defendant Hinna Khan, M.D.'s Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Attorneys of Record Pursuant to Northern District Of Illinois Local Rule 83.17 #99 . Attorneys Marilee Clausing, Matthew Ennis, and Matthew Kaminski of Hall Prangle & Schoonveld LLC, are withdrawn as counsel for Defendant, Hinna Khan, M.D. Attorneys Mark Burden, Joseph O'Rourke, and Monica Smit, of Donohue Brown Mathewson & Smyth LLC. are granted leave to file their appearance on behalf of Defendant, Hinna Khan, M.D. Mailed notice (axc).
January 14, 2022	Filing 99 MOTION by Attorney Marilee Clausing, Matthew Ennis, and Matthew Kaminski to withdraw as attorney for Hinna Khan. No party information provided (Kaminski, Matthew)
January 7, 2022	Filing 98 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the status report #97 , the court urges the parties to complete the depositions of Dr. Edward Pont, Debi Ferrarello, and Bonnie Ohnishi as soon as possible and to schedule the depositions of Defendants' six other experts. Parties are to file a joint status report by February 25, 2022, including the following information: (1) confirmation that Defendants timely served their additional expert reports by February 18, 2022; and (2) expert depositions to be completed; and (3) the confirmed schedule to complete those expert depositions. Mailed notice (ec)
January 6, 2022	Filing 97 STATUS Report Defendants' Status Report Regarding Status of Expert Discovery (Per Dkt. 96) by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP (Kaminski, Matthew)
December 14, 2021	Filing 96 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties' agreed Rule 35 protocol #95 ---treated as a motion to accept the agreed protocol and to amend the remaining expert discovery schedule---is granted. The court accepts the Rule 35 protocol included in the motion and orders the parties to adhere to the same. Defendants are ordered to comply with the following: (1) serve on Plaintiffs the Rule 26(a)(2) reports from Dr. Edward Pont, Debi Ferrarello, and Bonnie Ohnishi by January 5, 2022; (2) file a status report with the court, by January 6, 2022, confirming the service of these three reports on Plaintiffs and including the names of the other experts retained to prepare their own Rule 26(a)(2) reports; and (3) serve on Plaintiffs the remaining Rule 26(a)(2) reports by February 18, 2022. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
December 13, 2021	Filing 95 MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFPAgreed Protocol for Genetic Testing and Modification of Remaining Expert Discovery In Response to the Court's Order (Dkt. 94) (Kaminski, Matthew)
December 8, 2021	Filing 94 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Motion hearing held. For the reasons stated in open court, Defendants' motion to compel Rule 35 examination #89 is granted. Parties are to confer on the Rule 35 examination protocol (e.g., the collection of samples and the schedule for Dr. Gregory Enns's report on the sequencing and evaluation results) and then Defendants are to file a motion for an amendment to the expert discovery schedule, including the agreed (or competing) Rule 35 examination protocol, by December 13, 2021. Mailed notice (ec)
December 6, 2021	Filing 93 RESPONSE by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually)in Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to compel Defendants' Motion to Compel Genetic Testing Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35. #89 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Patterson, Matthew)
December 4, 2021	Filing 92 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the status report #91 , the court orders the parties to schedule and confirm the depositions of Defendants' experts by no later than December 17, 2021. Parties are to then file a joint status report by no later than December 20, 2021, advising the court of the confirmed deposition schedule. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
December 3, 2021	Filing 91 STATUS Report Defendants' Status Report Disclosing Names of Experts Pursuant to the Court's Order (Dkt. 84) by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP (Kaminski, Matthew)
December 1, 2021	Filing 90 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' motion to compel #89 is entered and continued. A hearing on this motion is scheduled for December 8, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. in courtroom 1019. Plaintiffs must be prepared to respond to the motion at the hearing. If Plaintiffs wish to submit a written response in preparation for the hearing, they must submit it by December 6, 2021, but it is not required. Mailed notice (ec)
November 30, 2021	Filing 89 MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP to compel Defendants' Motion to Compel Genetic Testing Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Ennis, Matthew)
November 15, 2021	Filing 88 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Trial Date Certain #87 is denied without prejudice. As Plaintiffs concede, expert discovery in the case will not conclude until March 2022. In addition, the courthouse's capacity for trials is constrained due to current COVID-19 protocols. The Court therefore declines to set a trial date at this time Mailed notice (axc).
November 5, 2021	Filing 87 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel PryorTrial Date Certain (Unopposed) (Patterson, Matthew)
October 23, 2021	Filing 86 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for extension of time #85 is granted to the extent that the parties have leave to present and depose Dr. Yitzchak Frank on November 23, 2021. The remainder of the expert discovery schedule is amended to the extent that Defendants have until December 22, 2021, to serve their Rule 26(a)(2) reports and Plaintiffs have until March 17, 2022, to depose Defendants' experts. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
October 22, 2021	Filing 85 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for extension of time to complete discovery (unopposed) (Timoney, Ryan)
September 28, 2021	Filing 84 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for an extension of time #83 is granted. Parties are to comply with the following amended expert discovery schedule: (1) Defendants to depose Plaintiffs' experts by November 15, 2021 (this is a firm deadline); (2) Defendants to serve their Rule 26(a)(2) reports on Plaintiffs by December 13, 2021; and (3) Plaintiffs to depose Defendants' experts by February 28, 2022. Defendants are to file a status report by December 3, 2021, with the names of the experts who will be offering opinions in Defendants' Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures. Mailed notice (ma,)
September 27, 2021	Filing 83 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for extension of time for Expert Discovery (Unopposed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Patterson, Matthew)
September 27, 2021	Filing 82 CERTIFICATE of Service Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Deposition Rider Requests to Elisa Abdulhayoglu, MD by Ryan Patrick Timoney on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Timoney, Ryan)
September 21, 2021	Filing 81 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor by Matthew Mitchell Patterson of Robert Patterson, Esq. (Patterson, Matthew)
August 30, 2021	Filing 80 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Service of Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Experts and Opinions Pursuant to Rule 26(A)(2) (Patterson, Matthew)
June 9, 2021	Filing 79 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to serve additional written discovery requests #78 is granted. Defendant Rush- Copley Medical Center, Inc. has until June 22, 2021, to serve its responses to Document 78-1. Mailed notice (ma,)
June 8, 2021	Filing 78 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for leave to file additional discovery (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Patterson, Matthew)
May 29, 2021	Filing 77 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time #76 is granted. The fact discovery deadline of May 28, 2021, is extended to July 28, 2021. This deadline is a firm deadline for both sides. If the deponents are not cooperating with the party seeking his or her deposition, the party must timely raise the issue with the court in order to complete the depositions by the new deadline. Parties are to also comply with the following amended expert discovery schedule: (1) Plaintiffs to serve their Rule 26(a)(2) reports on Defendants by August 30, 2021; (2) Defendants to depose Plaintiffs' experts by September 27, 2021; (3) Defendants to serve their Rule 26(a)(2) reports on Plaintiffs by October 25, 2021; and (4) Plaintiffs to depose Defendants' experts by November 22, 2021. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
May 28, 2021	Filing 76 MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for extension of time to complete discovery (Kaminski, Matthew)
May 6, 2021	Filing 75 QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE Order Signed by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 5/6/2021. (ma,)
May 6, 2021	Filing 74 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' unopposed motion for entry of qualified HIPAA protective order #73 is granted. Enter Qualified HIPAA Protective Order. Mailed notice (ma,)
May 6, 2021	Filing 73 MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for protective order Unopposed Defendants' Motion for Qualified HIPAA Protective Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Qualified HIPAA Protective Order)(Kaminski, Matthew)
May 4, 2021	Filing 72 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to use alternative service of a Rule 45 subpoena #71 is granted. First, the court finds that Plaintiffs have made diligent efforts to serve a deposition subpoena on Alexandra Driscoll and that the facts submitted by Plaintiffs suggest that Driscoll is evading service. Second, the facts also show that the addresses Plaintiffs have for Driscoll in Illinois and Michigan are the correct addresses for Driscoll and that she maintains residence at both places. As such, mailing a copy of the deposition subpoena to Driscoll is an acceptable means of alternative service. For these reasons, Plaintiffs are granted leave to serve a deposition subpoena on Driscoll by sending the same to her in Illinois and Michigan by First Class United States Mail. The deposition date must be at least 14 calendar days after the mailing date. Plaintiffs are to include the name and contact information for their attorney and the name of Defendants' attorney and his/her contact information in case Driscoll has to contact someone to reschedule the deposition. If Driscoll does not appear for her deposition, Plaintiffs are ordered to file a motion to enforce the subpoena and for sanctions within one week of the scheduled deposition and follow this court's standing order on noticing the motion. A copy of the motion and the notice of the motion hearing must be mailed to Driscoll in Illinois and in Michigan. The motion hearing time will be 11:00 a.m. and the motion is to be presented by phone. Plaintiffs are to include the following call-in information for the motion hearing: (877) 336-1839 and passcode 4333213#. If Driscoll fails to appear for her scheduled deposition, fails to show good cause for such failure, and fails to appear for the motion hearing, the court will consider Plaintiffs' request for attorney fees and costs associated with their motion practice. The court, as it has in the past, will also consider issuing a body attachment order (essentially a bench warrant) to the United States Marshals Service to secure Driscoll's deposition testimony if it is forced to do so. The court sincerely hopes that Driscoll cooperates with the attorneys in this case and appear for her deposition to answer questions. Plaintiffs are to include a copy of this order with the subpoena for the deposition so that Driscoll is properly advised of the situation. Mailed notice (ma,)
May 3, 2021	Filing 71 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel PryorAlternate Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Patterson, Matthew)
March 15, 2021	Filing 70 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' motion for extension of time to answer Plaintiffs' second set of written discovery requests #69 is granted. Defendants now have until March 26, 2021, to answer the second set. Mailed notice (ma,)
March 15, 2021	Filing 69 MOTION by Defendant Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. for extension of time to answer second set of written discovery through March 26, 2021 (Kaminski, Matthew)
March 14, 2021	Filing 68 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Written discovery is now closed, except for supplementing earlier discovery responses as required under Rule 26(e) and serving requests to admit and subpoenas for records. If the parties wish to serve supplemental written discovery requests, they must seek leave of court by filing a motion and attaching the proposed set of supplemental requests as an exhibit to the motion. All depositions must be conducted by phone or by video unless everyone who needs to appear for the deposition agrees to do so in person. If exhibits must be used during the phone/video depositions, the exhibits should be emailed to the opposing side within two business days prior to the depositions. Otherwise, the time spent sending exhibits (if the video platform does not allow for sharing documents) to the opposing counsel and the deponent during the deposition must be counted toward the seven-hour time limit. If the parties require an in-person deposition and there is no agreement, they must file a motion and explain the need for an in-person deposition. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
March 14, 2021	Filing 67 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' second motion to compel #66 is granted in part and denied in part. In their second motion, Plaintiffs seek to compel Defendants to provide deposition dates for two individuals (Elizabeth Hodge and Alexandra Driscoll) and to supplement their responses to Requests for Production of Documents ("RFPD") No. 25 and 32. As for the depositions, the motion is denied. However, the parties are to confirm the deposition date for Hodge by no later than March 17, 2021, to be completed by April 9, 2021. If the parties have already scheduled Hodge's deposition, the parties are to keep the date as is even if it is after April 9, 2021. As for RFPD No. 25, the motion is denied. The court agrees with Defendants that Plaintiffs fail to explain the connection between their allegations that Defendants and their employees failed to meet certain standards of care in August 2015 and "any and all" complaints lodged against the employees from 2010 to 2015. As for RFPD No. 32, the motion is granted to the extent that Defendants are to produce, by no later than March 26, 2021, the documents reflecting the requested staffing assignment ("for the pediatric, newborn, and neonatal units/departments") for the period from August 20 through August 22, 2015. Parties are ordered to complete all fact discovery by May 28, 2021. Parties are to also comply with the following expert discovery schedule: (1) Plaintiffs to serve their Rule 26(a)(2) reports on Defendants by July 2, 2021; (2) Defendants to depose Plaintiffs' experts by July 30, 2021; (3) Defendants to serve their Rule 26(a)(2) reports on Plaintiffs by August 27, 2021; and (4) Plaintiffs to depose Defendants' experts by September 24, 2021. Parties are urged to schedule the depositions of the experts once they have been retained and not wait to schedule them until after the service of the Rule 26(a)(2) reports. The status hearing scheduled for March 15, 2021, is cancelled. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
March 9, 2021	Filing 66 RESPONSE by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFPin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for discovery #63 (Kaminski, Matthew)
March 4, 2021	Filing 65 AGREED PROTECTIVE Order Regarding Placental Pathology Slides Signed by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 3/4/2021. (ma,)
March 4, 2021	Filing 64 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: On March 3, 2021, the parties emailed the court a draft agreed order for its entry. The court has reviewed the order and enters the same. Enter Agreed Protective Order Regarding Placental Pathology Slides. The parties are advised that the proper practice in this district is to file a motion for the entry of an agreed protective order explaining the need for one and attaching the proposed agreed protective order to the motion. The proposed order must also be emailed to the proposed order inbox as they have done in this case. This practice allows the docket to show why the court entered a protective order. Mailed notice (ma,)
February 23, 2021	Filing 63 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for discovery (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Patterson, Matthew)
February 9, 2021	Filing 62 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs (Patterson, Matthew)
February 5, 2021	Filing 61 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties' joint motion to cancel certain depositions #60 is granted. The scheduled depositions of Susan Tindall, Cynthia Cain, and Kathleen Wyman are cancelled. To the extent that Plaintiffs plan on issuing a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice on the topic of audit trails, they must issue the notice on the Corporate Defendants by no later than February 12, 2021. Defendants then have until February 19, 2021, to advise Plaintiffs of any objections they have to the Rule 30(b)(6) topics. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
February 5, 2021	Filing 60 MOTION by Plaintiffs Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for Leave to Cancel Depositions Joint (Patterson, Matthew)
January 26, 2021	Filing 59 CERTIFICATE of Service by Ryan Patrick Timoney on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Timoney, Ryan)
January 17, 2021	Filing 58 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time #57 is granted. Defendants now have until February 5, 2021, to complete their production of supplemental written discovery responses to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs then have until February 23, 2021, to file their motion to compel. If a motion is filed, Defendants have until March 9, 2021, to file a response thereto. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
January 15, 2021	Filing 57 MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for extension of time Unopposed Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time Serve Supplemental Discovery Answers As To Agency Discovery Only (Dkt. 54) (Kaminski, Matthew)
January 7, 2021	Filing 56 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are not to change the confirmed deposition dates identified in Defendant's status report, (R. 55), without leave of court. However, the parties are free to swap deponents by agreement for the dates confirmed without leave of court. A status hearing is scheduled for March 15, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. by phone. Parties are to use the same call-in information. Mailed notice (ma,)
January 6, 2021	Filing 55 STATUS Report Defendants' Status Report In Compliance With The Court's 12/23/20 Order (Dkt. 54) by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP (Kaminski, Matthew)
December 23, 2020	Filing 54 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held by phone. Defendants reported that the parties have confirmed the deposition dates for Lindsay K. Vardell (January 8, 2021), Susan Tindall February 8, 2021), and Kristen Miltz (February 2, 2021). Defendants also reported that Bertha I. Ibarra and Kathleen A. Wyman are former employees and that Defendants are in the process of reaching out to them. Finally, Defendants reported that they still need to confirm the deposition dates identified in the prior status report, (see R. 52 at 1). Defendants are ordered to file a status report by January 6, 2021, advising the court of the confirmed deposition schedule for the current employees and whether Defendants' attorneys will be representing Ibarra and Wyman. If they have not heard back from either former employee by January 5, 2021, or these former employees do not wish to be represented by Defendants' counsel, Defendants are ordered to provide Plaintiffs the last known contact information for the former employees (including phone numbers and mailing and email addresses) by January 6, 2021. Defendants are also ordered to provide their supplemental written discovery responses to Plaintiffs by January 15, 2021. Plaintiffs then have until February 2, 2021, to file their motion to compel. If a motion is filed, Defendants have until February 16, 2021, to file a response thereto. Mailed notice (ma,)
December 18, 2020	Filing 53 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: A status hearing is scheduled for December 23, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. by phone. The conference call number for the status hearing is (877) 336-1839 and the passcode is 4333213. Defendants are ordered to have the following individuals appear for the hearing by phone: (1) Bertha I. Ibarra; (2) Kathleen A. Wyman; (3) Susan Tindall; (4) Lindsay K. Vardell; and (5) Kristen Miltz. (Defendants are not required to produce those who are no longer employees.) The purpose of the hearing is to schedule their depositions. For those individuals who do not appear, their depositions will be scheduled based on the attorneys' availability. Those individuals who are able to confirm dates for their depositions before the status hearing, they are not required to call-in for the hearing. Parties may advise the court of the additional confirmed deposition dates to the court at the hearing. Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
December 18, 2020	Filing 52 STATUS Report Joint by Candence Bank, N.A., Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through the Guardian of his Estate), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) (Timoney, Ryan)
November 25, 2020	Filing 51 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' motion to compel #46 is denied without prejudice. Parties are to confer on Plaintiffs' issues with Defendants' responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 5-11, 16, 17, 20, 24, 25, 31, 32, 33, 37, 39, and 40 by December 11, 2020. If disputes remain, the parties are to file a joint status report by December 18, 2020, identifying the remaining disputes and each side's position on those disputes. As for the discovery schedule the court issued on June 15, 2020, (R. 33), it is stricken. The court will reset the deadlines at a later time. Parties are to schedule and confirm the needed fact depositions (to take place in February and March 2021) by no later than December 11, 2020. This confirmed schedule must also be included in the December 18, 2020 status report. If there are depositions already scheduled and confirmed and Plaintiffs wish to take them, those depositions should take place as scheduled. The court takes into consideration the current reported status of the public health crisis and the fact that the proposed deponents are frontline healthcare employees. Mailed notice (ma,)
November 25, 2020	Filing 50 NOTICE by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP re response in opposition to motion, #49 (Kaminski, Matthew)
November 24, 2020	Filing 49 RESPONSE by Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFPin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor to compel Deposition Dates and Written Discovery #46 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Kaminski, Matthew)
November 16, 2020	Filing 48 Second AMENDED complaint by Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through his parents and next friends Adriana Madrigal and Nathaniel Pryor), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually), Adriana Madrigal against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Attorney Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B, Physician Report)(Patterson, Matthew)
November 14, 2020	Filing 47 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' motion to compel #46 is entered and continued. Defendants are ordered to file a response to the motion, by November 24, 2020, to the extent that it seeks to compel Defendants to supplement their responses to certain requests for production of documents. To the extent that the motion seeks to compel the scheduling of depositions, the parties are to continue their efforts to schedule the depositions of only those individuals for whom the outstanding documents Plaintiffs request are not needed. The court will not permit any individual to be deposed twice based on the argument that Plaintiffs did not have access to documents they requested but not produced. Defendants are to include the confirmed deposition schedule for these individuals when filing their response to the motion.Mailed notice (Kim, Young)
November 13, 2020	Filing 46 MOTION by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor to compel Deposition Dates and Written Discovery (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Timoney, Ryan)
November 13, 2020	Filing 45 STATUS Report Joint by Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through his parents and next friends Adriana Madrigal and Nathaniel Pryor), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) (Patterson, Matthew)
November 13, 2020	Filing 44 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Young B. Kim for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision, including setting all deadlines and settlement matters. (axc) Mailed notice.
November 13, 2020	Filing 43 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to amend complaint #42 is granted. Plaintiff is directed to file the Second Amended Complaint For Damages as a separate docket entry. The Court refers discovery supervision, including setting all deadlines and settlement matters to Magistrate Judge Kim. Mailed notice (axc).
November 12, 2020	Filing 42 MOTION by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor for leave to file Amended Complaint (Unopposed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Patterson, Matthew)
November 9, 2020	Filing 41 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Service of Plaintiffs' Rule 26(a)(2)(c) Disclosures (Timoney, Ryan)
October 5, 2020	Filing 40 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the reassignment of the case, the status hearing of 11/20/2020 with Judge Chang is vacated. Emailed notice (mw, )
September 28, 2020	Filing 39 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 20-0027: Pursuant that to the Executive Committee Order entered on September 23, 2020 the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 371 cases be reassigned to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama's webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama to the Court's civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that he shall receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama for all further proceedings. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 9/28/2020.(docket8, )
September 4, 2020	Filing 38 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Court appreciates the detailed discovery status report, R. 37, and on review of it, simply continues the tracking status hearing of 09/11/2020 to 11/20/2020 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a discovery status report by 11/13/2020. Emailed notice (mw, )
September 1, 2020	Filing 37 STATUS Report Joint by Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through his parents and next friends Adriana Madrigal and Nathaniel Pryor), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually) (Patterson, Matthew)
July 16, 2020	Filing 36 CERTIFICATE of Service (discovery to all Defendants) by Ryan Patrick Timoney on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Timoney, Ryan)
July 10, 2020	Filing 35 ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk7, Docket)
June 24, 2020	Filing 34 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor. (Patterson, Matthew)
June 15, 2020	Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, as well as the pleadings to evaluate the scope of the case, the Court sets the following schedule. MID disclosures due by 07/09/2020. The first round of written discovery requests must be issued by 07/16/2020. Fact discovery, including any treating health care providers (if any), must be completed by 01/26/2021. Rule 26(a)(2)(C) summaries for treating health care providers (if any) must be disclosed 75 days in advance of the fact discovery deadline, and adjusts with any general extension of fact discovery deadline. Rule 16(b) deadline to add parties or amend pleadings is 11/15/2020. The retained-expert schedule will be set later. The status hearing of 06/22/2020 is reset to 09/11/2020 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a discovery status report by 09/01/2020. Mailed notice (mw, )
June 9, 2020	Filing 32 ANSWER to amended complaint by Hinna Khan(Kaminski, Matthew)
June 9, 2020	Filing 31 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP(Kaminski, Matthew)
June 9, 2020	Filing 30 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc.(Kaminski, Matthew)
June 8, 2020	Filing 29 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) (Joint, Revised), filed by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor. (Patterson, Matthew)
June 2, 2020	Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendants' unopposed extension motion to answer the amended complaint #27 is granted through 06/09/2020. Mailed notice (mw, )
June 1, 2020	Filing 27 MOTION by Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP for extension of time to file answer regarding amended complaint, #8 (Unopposed) Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time of 8 Days to File Answers to Amended Complaint (Kaminski, Matthew)
May 26, 2020	Filing 26 ORDER ORDER Fourth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on May 26, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. For non-emergency motions, no motion may be noticed for presentment on a date earlier than July 15, 2020. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 5/26/2020: Mailed notice. (docket8, )
May 1, 2020	Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the Third Amended General Order 20-0012, the answer deadline is reset from 05/05/2020 to 06/02/2020 for all three Defendants. The Court asks the parties to recalculate the MID disclosure and other discovery deadlines in the joint status report, and file a revised status report by 06/08/2020. Status hearing of 05/14/2020 is reset to 06/22/2020 at 9:15 a.m. The status hearing will be held telephonically. The parties shall provide a contact number to the courtroom deputy (Michael_Wing@ilnd.uscourts.gov) by 1:00 p.m. on the prior business day. Mailed notice (mw, )
April 24, 2020	Filing 24 ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020: Mailed notice. (docket7, )
April 3, 2020	Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of Second Amended General Order 20-0012, the status hearing of 04/16/2020 is reset to 05/14/2020 at 9:30 a.m. The answer deadline is reset to 05/05/2020 for all three Defendants. The Court asks the parties to recalculate the MID disclosure and other discovery deadlines in the joint status report, and file a revised status report three business days in advance of the new status hearing date. Mailed notice (mw, )
March 30, 2020	Filing 22 ORDER CORRECTED ENTRY: ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice...Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020:Mailed notice(docket7, )
March 23, 2020	Filing 21 ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/23/2020: Mailed notice. (docket7, )
March 19, 2020	Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of Amended General Order 20-0012, the status hearing of 03/26/2020 is reset to 04/16/2020 at 9:15 a.m., and the answer deadline is reset to 04/07/2020 for all three Defendants. The Court asks the parties to recalculate the MID disclosure and other discovery deadlines in the joint status report, and file a revised status report three business days in advance of the new status hearing date. Mailed notice (mw, )
March 16, 2020	Filing 19 ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, )
March 13, 2020	Filing 18 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor. (Timoney, Ryan)
February 7, 2020	Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP by Matthew J. Ennis (Ennis, Matthew)
February 5, 2020	Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP by Marilee Clausing (Clausing, Marilee)
January 30, 2020	Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Hinna Khan, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP by Matthew Kaminski (Kaminski, Matthew)
January 30, 2020	Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc.. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. waiver sent on 1/17/2020, answer due 3/17/2020. (Kaminski, Matthew)
January 30, 2020	Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Hinna Khan. Hinna Khan waiver sent on 1/17/2020, answer due 3/17/2020. (Kaminski, Matthew)
January 30, 2020	Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP. Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP waiver sent on 1/17/2020, answer due 3/17/2020. (Kaminski, Matthew)
January 29, 2020	Filing 11 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. on 1/17/2020 by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor. Waiver of service due by 2/16/2020. (Beam, Jack)
January 29, 2020	Filing 10 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Rush-Copley Medical Group NFP on 1/17/2020 by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor. Waiver of service due by 2/16/2020. (Beam, Jack)
January 29, 2020	Filing 9 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Hinna Khan, MD on 1/17/2020 by Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor. Waiver of service due by 2/16/2020. (Beam, Jack)
January 10, 2020	Filing 8 AMENDED complaint by Nathaniel Pryor, Jr(a disabled minor, by and through his parents and next friends Adriana Madrigal and Nathaniel Pryor), Nathaniel Pryor(Indiviually), Adriana Madrigal against All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Atty Affidavit), #2 Exhibit (Physician Report))(Timoney, Ryan)
January 6, 2020	Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Court has reviewed the complaint, R. 1, Compl., and issues the following jurisdictional inquiry. Although the complaint does not explicitly say so, Plaintiffs presumably rely on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1332, for subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs alleges that they "reside" in Texas. Id. 3. But for purposes of subject matter jurisdiction, the citizenship of partiesas distinct from residencyis what matters. Hunter v. Amin, 583 F.3d 486, 491 (7th Cir. 2009). Plaintiffs also failed to properly allege the citizenship of the defendant corporations. Plaintiffs allege that defendants Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. and Rush-Copley Medical Group, NFP both do business in Illinois. Id. 4, 16. But a corporation's citizenship for diversity jurisdiction is its place of incorporation and principal place of business, neither of which Plaintiffs explicitly allege. 28 U.S.C. 1332(c). Plaintiff shall either amend the complaint by 01/21/2020 with the necessary allegations (if they can do so in good faith), or file a memorandum by that date explaining why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The initial status hearing is set for 03/23/2020 at 9:00 a.m., with a joint initial status report due by 03/13/2020. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
December 31, 2019	Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, )
December 30, 2019	Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor by Matthew Mitchell Patterson (Patterson, Matthew)
December 30, 2019	Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor by Jack Milton Beam (Beam, Jack)
December 30, 2019	Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Adriana Madrigal, Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Nathaniel Pryor by Ryan Patrick Timoney (Timoney, Ryan)
December 30, 2019	Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Timoney, Ryan)
December 30, 2019	Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nathaniel Pryor, Jr, Adriana Madrigal; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16571140. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2019-12-30 Exhibit A - Rule 2-622 Attorney Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 2019-12-30 Exhibit B - Rule 2-6735 ILSC 52-622 Report of Consulting Physician, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Timoney, Ryan)
December 30, 2019	CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pryor et al v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adriana Madrigal
Represented By:	Jack Milton Beam
Represented By:	Matthew Mitchell Patterson
Represented By:	Ryan Patrick Timoney
Represented By:	Jack Beam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Pryor, Jr.
Represented By:	Jack Milton Beam
Represented By:	Matthew Mitchell Patterson
Represented By:	Ryan Patrick Timoney
Represented By:	Jack Beam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Pryor
Represented By:	Jack Milton Beam
Represented By:	Matthew Mitchell Patterson
Represented By:	Ryan Patrick Timoney
Represented By:	Jack Beam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RUSH-COPLEY MEDICAL GROUP NFP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candence Bank, N.A.
Represented By:	Matthew Mitchell Patterson
Represented By:	Ryan Patrick Timoney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc.
Represented By:	Matthew Kaminski
Represented By:	Marilee Clausing
Represented By:	Matthew J. Ennis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: M.D. HINNA KHAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hinna Khan
Represented By:	Matthew Kaminski
Represented By:	Marilee Clausing
Represented By:	Matthew J. Ennis
Represented By:	Mark M. Burden
Represented By:	Joseph L Rourke
Represented By:	Monica Lee Smit
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?