Poole v. Aguinaldo et al
| Ahmad Poole |
| E. Aguinaldo, Jr., C/O Norman, Randy Pfister, Tina Tomaras and Lt. Jaburek |
| 1:2020cv00014 |
| January 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied for lack of showing indigency. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this case, he must prepay the $400 filing fee no later than 4/17/2020. Failure to comply with this order by the aforementioned date will result in dismissal of this case. Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 2/28/2020. Mailed notice(pk, )
|
|
Filing 5
RECEIVED Amended Complaint and 1 copy by Ahmad Poole. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 1/8/20)(pk, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Plaintiff Ahmad Poole for attorney representation (pk, )
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ahmad Poole for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibit) (pk, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pk, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Ahmad Poole. (Exhibits) (pk, ) (Received 2 service copies on 1/16/2020) Modified on 1/21/2020 (pk, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
