Muhammad v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Rasul Muhammad |
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and ECD-Great Street DE, LLC |
1:2020cv00085 |
January 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Charles R Norgle |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Rasul Muhammad. ECD-Great Street DE, LLC waiver sent on 1/29/2020, answer due 3/30/2020. (Kramer, Raymond) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant ECD-Great Street DE, LLC by Melissa Anne Logan (Logan, Melissa) |
Filing 5 AMENDED complaint by Rasul Muhammad against ECD-Great Street DE, LLC and terminating Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (Kramer, Raymond) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rasul Muhammad as to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020. (Kramer, Raymond) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (jg, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rasul Muhammad by Raymond Joseph Kramer, III (Kramer, Raymond) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kramer, Raymond) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rasul Muhammad; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16582928.(Kramer, Raymond) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.