Maddux v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Amy Maddux |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2020cv00129 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUR-REPLY by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to motion for miscellaneous relief #2 to Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award (Saelao, Rebecca) |
| Filing 14 REPLY by Amy Maddux to response in opposition to motion, #4 (Chami, David) |
| Filing 13 PAYMENT of Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16601518. (Chami, David) |
| Filing 12 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Chami, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-14213811. (Saelao, Rebecca) (ph, ) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. by Lucia Nale. (ph, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. by Michelle V Dohra. (ph, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. by Michael Hercules Bornhorst. (ph, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Maddux by David Ali Chami. (ph, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: The Clerk's Office is directed to use 1/7/2020 as the file date for the new civil action, and for Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (Dkt. No. 41 ), Exhibit A to Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (Dkt. No. 43 ), Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to confirm the arbitration award (Dkt. No. 44 ), and Order (Dkt. No. 45 ). Mailed notice (ef, ) (ph, ) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Amy Maddux #2 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Clayton Swain in Support of Opposition to Motion, #2 Declaration of Rebecca Saelao in Support of Opposition to Motion) (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT A to Motion to Confirm arbitration award #2 by Plaintiff Amy Maddux. (ph, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION by Plaintiff Amy Maddux to confirm arbitration award (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (ph, ) |
Filing 1
ORDER: Motion hearing held. For the reasons discussed on the record, the Court finds that Plaintiff's motion to confirm arbitration award 41 should have been filed under a new action. Accordingly, with the agreement of the parties, Docket Entries Numbered 41, 42, 43, and 44 are stricken from the docket of Case No. 18-cv-00257, and the case remains closed. The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new civil action directly assigning to Judge Wood and Magistrate Judge Cole and to docket under a new case number and to docket under a new case number (1) this Order as Docket Entry Number #1 , (2) Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (Dkt. No. 41 ) as Docket Entry Number #2 , (3) Exhibit A to Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (Dkt. No. 43 ) as Docket Entry Number #3 , and (4) Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to confirm the arbitration award (Dkt. No. 44 ) as Docket Entry Number #4 . In addition, the attorney appearances in Case No. 18-cv-00257 shall be entered in the docket of the newly-opened case. In order to proceed with the new action, however, Plaintiff must file a separate civil cover sheet and pay the $400 filing fee by 1/10/2020. Failure to do so will result in the new case being summarily dismissed. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on December 11, 2019. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 1/7/2020. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maddux v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Hercules Bornhorst |
| Represented By: | Lucia Nale |
| Represented By: | Michelle V Dohra |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Snavely Saelao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Maddux | |
| Represented By: | David Ali Chami |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
