Pearson v. Walmart Inc
| Julie Pearson |
| Walmart Inc |
| 1:2020cv00141 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey Cummings |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Cummings. Status hearing set for 3/17/20 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 1350. Parties are directed to confer with each other and file a joint status report in accordance with Judge Cummings' Standing Order for Initial Status Report by 3/10/20. Mailed notice (ber, )
|
|
Filing 10
Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Jeffrey Cummings for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: set/extend discovery deadlines, discovery supervision, and settlement.(rao, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Status hearing held on 2/20/2020 and continued to 8/20/2020 at 9:45 a.m. Fact discovery to be completed by 8/20/2020. (rao, )
|
|
Filing 8
Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart Inc (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Balog, James)
|
|
Filing 7
STATUS Report by Walmart Inc (Balog, James)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 2/12/2020. The Court will hold a status hearing on 2/20/2020 at 10:00 a.m. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, )
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Julie Pearson by John K Vrdolyak (Vrdolyak, John)
|
|
Filing 4
MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (gcy, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart Inc by Alyssa Rae Spartz (Spartz, Alyssa)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart Inc by James P. Balog (Balog, James)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County Law Division, case number (2019 L 011520) filed by Walmart Inc Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16593250. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Balog, James)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pearson v. Walmart Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julie Pearson | |
| Represented By: | John K Vrdolyak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc | |
| Represented By: | Alyssa Rae Spartz |
| Represented By: | James P. Balog |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
