Lombardo v. Saul
| Christopher A. Lombardo |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv00158 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Susan E Cox |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 425 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been reassigned to Judge Cox. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 3/9/2020 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 5/11/2020. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 6/25/2020. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 7/9/2020.Mailed notice (np, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Susan E. Cox, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/14/20. (kp, )
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. This case will be sent to the executive committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court is stricken. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
| Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (pk, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The Court sets the case for an initial status hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a) & (c) on 3/25/2020 at 9:30 a.m. and directs plaintiff's attorney to advise each defendant or its counsel of record in writing of the status hearing date. (mk) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Saul (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher A. Lombardo as to Andrew Saul served on 1/9/2020, answer due 3/9/2020 (Attachments: #1 John R. Lausch, US Attorney, #2 William Barr, Attorney General)(pj, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Andrew Saul, John Lausch, William Barr. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Christopher A. Lombardo (sxb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (sxb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christopher A. Lombardo (Exhibits) (sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lombardo v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher A. Lombardo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Inez Treacy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
