Ridderhoff v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
Melissa Ridderhoff |
Equifax Information Services LLC and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. |
1:2020cv00167 |
January 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Defendants' motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead. Defendants' responsive pleadings are due by 3/16/20. The Court strikes the status date set for 3/10/20 and resets it to 3/26/20 at 1:30 PM with the initial status report due by 3/19/20. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services LLC (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 10 AGREED - NOTICE of Motion by Rodney L. Lewis for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/19/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC for extension of time to file answer - AGREED (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC by Claire Brennan (Brennan, Claire) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Melissa Ridderhoff as to Equifax Information Services LLC on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020. (Mikulaschek, Alexander) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Equifax Information Services LLC (jg, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 3/10/2020 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 3/3/2020. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mikulaschek, Alexander) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Melissa Ridderhoff by Alexander John Mikulaschek (Mikulaschek, Alexander) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Melissa Ridderhoff; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16599383. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Settlement Agreement, #2 Exhibit Proof of Payment, #3 Exhibit Credit Report, #4 Exhibit Dispute Letter, #5 Exhibit Credit Report)(Mikulaschek, Alexander) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.