Sanchez v. McCoy et al
| Hugo Sanchez |
| Superientedant Walsh, Hampton, McCoy, Tom Dart and C.C.D.O.C. |
| 1:2020cv00273 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's amended complaint #6 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. If Plaintiff seeks to proceed, by March 24, 2020, he must submit a second amended complaint on the Court's required form. If he fails to do so, this case will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's motion for court ordered visits to the law library #7 is denied, however, the Court requests that correctional officials grant Plaintiff reasonable access to the jail's law library. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Executive Director of the Cook County Jail. The Clerk is also directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of this order, along with a civil rights amended complaint form and USM-285 Form. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 2/25/2020. Mailed notice(pk, )
|
| MAILED a copy of order dated 2/25/2020 to the Executive Director of the Cook County Jail. Mailed to Plaintiff a copy of order dated 2/25/2020, along with a civil rights amended complaint form and USM-285 Form. (pk, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Hugo Sanchez for attorney representation. (Envelope not postmarked) (pk, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for court order requesting 3 weekly visits to law library by Plaintiff Hugo Sanchez. (Envelope not postmarked) (pk, ) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED complaint by Hugo Sanchez (pk, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The initial partial filing fee is waived. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to make monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the trust fund account officer at the facility currently having custody of Plaintiff and the Court's Fiscal Department. Summonses, however, shall not issue. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must submit an amended complaint that is written in English and a completed USM-285 (Marshals service) form for each Defendant named in the amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to do so by February 21, 2020, the Court will dismiss the case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an amended civil rights complaint form, a blank USM-285 form and instructions, and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 1/17/2020. Mailed notice(pk, )
|
| EMAILED order dated 1/17/2020, #5 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail (pk, ) |
| MAILED to Plaintiff an amended civil rights complaint form, a blank USM-285 form and instructions, and a copy of order dated 1/17/2020. (pk, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Hugo Sanchez for attorney representation (pk, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Hugo Sanchez for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibit) (pk, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pk, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Hugo Sanchez. (Exhibit) (pk, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2020: #1 Envelope not postmarked) (pk, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
