Princeps Secundus LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
| Princeps Secundus LLC |
| Motorola Mobility LLC |
| 1:2020cv00318 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Informal patent conference is set for 4/8/2020 at 11:00 AM.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
| Filing 14 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Motorola Mobility LLC (Klapp, Louis) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC by Louis Anding Klapp, III (Klapp, Louis) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC by Stephen M. Hankins (Hankins, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Motion to appear pro hac vice #9 is granted; Attorney Timothy Devlin for Princeps Secundus LLC added. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Princeps Secundus LLC as to Motorola Mobility LLC on 1/22/2020, answer due 2/12/2020. (Benchell, Neil) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16630751. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:The Local Rules of course apply to all patent cases filed in this District. It is Judge Durkin's practice, however, to hold an informal, off the record meeting with the attorneys for the parties as soon as possible after all parties have counsel who have filed appearances. All discussions at the meeting will be inadmissible in any later proceeding under Federal Rule of Evidence 408.The purpose of the meeting is to see whether an early resolution of the case, or a narrowing or prioritizing of the contested issues can occur before any scheduling order is prepared by the parties. No position papers or other briefs should be filed in advance of the meeting, which will last an hour or less. Counsel shall collaborate in selecting a prompt date and call Judge Durkin's courtroom deputy, Sandy Newland at 312-435-6870 to schedule. No answer to the complaint is required until after this meeting, which is intended to minimize the costs of this uniquely expensive kind of litigation. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Motion to appear pro hac vice #6 is granted; Attorney Patrick Richard Delaney for Princeps Secundus LLC added. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16627921. (Delaney, Patrick) |
| Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Princeps Secundus LLC (Benchell, Neil) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (pj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC (txl, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Princeps Secundus LLC by Neil A Benchell (Benchell, Neil) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Benchell, Neil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Princeps Secundus LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16621137. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2)(Benchell, Neil) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
