Peat v. N.R.C. Stateville C.C. Field Service
| James Peat |
| N.R.C. Stateville C.C. Field Service |
| 1:2020cv00380 |
| January 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff James Peat (Envelope postmarked 2/182020) (bg, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to proceed to screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915A, he must either (1) prepay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00; or (2) submit a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis that is signed by him, certified by an appropriate official, and accompanied by trust fund account statements showing all transactions to his accounts from the date he was re-admitted to custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections in October 2019 to the date he responds to this order. Because Plaintiff was incarcerated at more than one facility during that time, he must provide a certified trust fund account statement from each facility at which he was incarcerated. Failure to comply with this order by March 18, 2020, will result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. Failure to keep the Court informed of his address may lead to dismissal of this case for failure to comply with a Court order and for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 , which does not reflect what effort he has made to obtain an attorney on his own, is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 2/7/2020. Mailed notice. (bg, )
|
| MAILED copy of order dated 2/7/2020 and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff. (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff James Peat for attorney representation (bg, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff James Peat for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (bg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by James Peat (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Envelope postmarked 1/08/2020) (bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peat v. N.R.C. Stateville C.C. Field Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: N.R.C. Stateville C.C. Field Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Peat | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
