Anderson v. Anderson
Gary Anderson |
Cheryl Anderson |
1:2020cv00439 |
January 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Matthew F Kennelly |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Defendant's motion to extend time #6 is granted; response to complaint is to be filed by 4/3/2020. However, the initial status hearing remains set for 3/30/2020 as previously ordered, and counsel are to be fully prepared to proceed with the status haring at that time. (mk) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Initial status hearing is set to 9:00 a.m. on 3/30/2020 before Judge Kennelly, in Chambers, Room 2188. Parties are to review and comply with Judge Kennelly's standing initial order, which may be found on his web page, located at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_JUDGES/KENNELLY/INIT-ORD.htm. (mk) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by E. Philip Groben for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #6 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/11/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Groben, E. Philip) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Cheryl Anderson for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Groben, E. Philip) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cheryl Anderson by E. Philip Groben (Groben, E. Philip) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Gary Anderson regarding Summons and Complaint served on Cheryl Anderson on February 13, 2020 (Vogler, Matthew) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cheryl Anderson (txl, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gary Anderson by Matthew Edward Vogler (Vogler, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogler, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gary Anderson; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16633247. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Vogler, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anderson v. Anderson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cheryl Anderson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gary Anderson | |
Represented By: | Matthew Edward Vogler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.