Book v. Saul
| Barbara J. Book |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2020cv00547 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Young B Kim |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the amended general order, the government is directed to file the administrative record by May 8, 2020. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is now due by July 10, 2020. The government's response and/or cross-motion for summary judgment is now due by September 18, 2020. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, she may file a reply brief by October 2, 2020, but one is not required. Unless this court amends this schedule, it will stand. Mailed notice (ags)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government is directed to file the administrative record by April 17, 2020. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by June 19, 2020. The government's response and/or cross- motion for summary judgment is due by August 21, 2020. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, she may file a reply brief by September 4, 2020, but one is not required. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. Mailed notice (ma,)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Gary Feinerman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Gary Feinerman on 3/2/2020. (rc, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The parties have consented to proceed before Magistrate Judge Kim #8 . The status hearing set for 3/30/2020 #6 is stricken. This case will be forwarded to the Executive Committee for reassignment to Magistrate Judge Kim for further proceedings.Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Donohue, Megan)
|
|
Filing 7
DESIGNATION of Megan Elizabeth Donohue as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Donohue, Megan)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 3/23/2020 #5 is stricken and re-set for 3/30/2020 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. Initial status hearing set for 3/23/2020 at 9:00 a.m. By 3/16/2020, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether they agree to a remand and whether they consent to reassignment for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge. With respect to scheduling, the parties shall comply with Local Rule 16.4.Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, )
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Barbara J. Book for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Horn, John)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Barbara J. Book by John E. Horn (Horn, John)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Horn, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Barbara J. Book; (Horn, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Book v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara J. Book | |
| Represented By: | John E. Horn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
