Gilbert v. Codilis & Associates, P.C.
Steven M. Gilbert |
Codilis & Associates, P.C. |
1:2020cv00632 |
January 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Harry D Leinenweber |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #9 is entered and briefed as follows: response by 3/31/20, reply by 4/7/20. Status hearing/ruling is set for 5/12/20 at 9:00 a.m. No appearance is needed on 3/17/20 or 4/8/20. Mailed notice(maf) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Adam A Price for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #9 before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/8/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Price, Adam) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Codilis & Associates, P.C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Price, Adam) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Codilis & Associates, P.C. by Adam A Price (Price, Adam) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven M. Gilbert as to Codilis & Associates, P.C. on 2/7/2020, answer due 2/28/2020. (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Status hearing set for 3/17/2020 at 9:00 AM.Mailed notice(maf) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Codilis & Associates, P.C. (jg, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
Filing 5 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Steven M. Gilbert regarding complaint #1 (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Steven M. Gilbert by Victor Thomas Metroff (Metroff, Victor) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Steven M. Gilbert by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Steven M. Gilbert by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Steven M. Gilbert; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16665002. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gilbert v. Codilis & Associates, P.C. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven M. Gilbert | |
Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
Represented By: | Victor Thomas Metroff |
Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Codilis & Associates, P.C. | |
Represented By: | Adam A Price |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.