Port v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Jeffrey Howard Port |
Chicago Field Office of the US Citizenship & Immigration Service, Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, US Citizenship & Immigration Service and Kevin Riddle |
1:2020cv00984 |
February 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Harry D Leinenweber |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeffrey Howard Port by Charles Hugh Wintersteen (Wintersteen, Charles) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wintersteen, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jeffrey Howard Port; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16714061.(Wintersteen, Charles) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Chicago Field Office of the US Citizenship & Immigration Service, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Kevin Riddle, US Citizenship & Immigration Service, Chad Wolf, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (txl, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (axc, ) |
NEW PARTIES: Chad Wolf, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and Kevin Riddle added to case caption. (Wintersteen, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.