Pactiv LLC v. Perez
| Pactiv LLC |
| Michael Perez |
| 1:2020cv01296 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket12, )
|
|
Filing 17
Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement STATEMENT by Pactiv LLC (Marsh, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff has until 4/10/20 to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 . Reply, if any, is due 5/1/20. The court will rule by mail. No appearance necessary on 3/18/20. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged diversity jurisdiction in its complaint. On or before 3/27/20, Plaintiff shall file a jurisdictional supplement, as a separate docket entry. For individuals, "[c]itizenship means domicile (the person's long-term plan for a state of habitation) rather than just current residence." Myrick v. WellPoint, Inc., 764 F.3d 662, 664 (7th Cir. 2014). For LLCs, the citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its members." Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007). Thus "an LLC's jurisdictional statement must identify the citizenship of each of its members as of the date the complaint or notice of removal was filed, and, if those members have members, the citizenship of those members as well." Id. In addition, allegations of citizenship based on "information and belief" are insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction in the Seventh Circuit. See Brickstructures, Inc. v. Coaster Dynamix, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159681, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 28, 2017). If Plaintiff fails to file the jurisdictional supplement as directed, the case may be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (td, )
|
|
Filing 12
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland for all further proceedings. Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/12/2020. (td, )
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Motion by David Porter for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #10 before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/18/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Porter, David)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Michael Perez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Declaration of Michael Perez), #2 Exhibit 1-7 to the Perez Declaration, #3 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Porter, David)
|
|
Filing 9
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber for all further proceedings. Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/4/20. (kp, )
|
|
MIDP NOTICE: This case has been reassigned to a judge that is not participating in the MIDP Program therefore, this case is no longer part of MIDP Program regarding #9 . (kp, )
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Perez by David Porter (Porter, David)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pactiv LLC as to Michael Perez on 2/24/2020, answer due 3/16/2020. (Marsh, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Michael Perez (dxb, )
|
|
Filing 5
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pactiv LLC (Marsh, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pactiv LLC by Michael Dale Wexler (Wexler, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pactiv LLC by Robyn Elizabeth Marsh (Marsh, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marsh, Robyn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Pactiv LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16752154. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Marsh, Robyn)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ecw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pactiv LLC v. Perez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Perez | |
| Represented By: | David Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pactiv LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael Dale Wexler |
| Represented By: | Robyn Elizabeth Marsh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
