Stieglitz v. Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc.
| David C. Stieglitz |
| Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01320 |
| February 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Pursuant to Second Amended General Order 20-0012, the 4/7/2020 status hearing #7 is stricken and re-set to 5/12/2020 at 9:00 a.m. In the meantime, if any party wishes to present a scheduling or other issue or question to the court, that party should send an email to the Courtroom Deputy (Jackie_Deanes@ilnd.uscourts.gov) and the proposed order email box (Proposed_Order_Feinerman@ilnd.uscourts.gov), with a copy to all other counsel, and the court will respond as soon as practicable. If any party wishes to extend, shorten, or revoke in a particular case the filing extensions granted by Paragraph 2 of Second Amended General Order 20-0012, that party shall file a motion on the case docket and shall indicate in the motion whether the relief sought is agreed or opposed. Parties may file other non-emergency motions on the case docket as they see fit. Emergency relief in any case, or emergency relief from Second Amended General Order 20-0012, shall be sought in the manner set forth in Paragraphs 5-6 of Second Amended General Order 20-0012.Mailed notice.(jlj) |
Filing 10
ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket3, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David C. Stieglitz as to Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc. on 3/9/2020, answer due 3/30/2020. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 4/7/2020 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc. (dxb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David C. Stieglitz by Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David C. Stieglitz by Eric Donald Coleman (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David C. Stieglitz by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff David C. Stieglitz by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by David C. Stieglitz; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16753841. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stieglitz v. Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Malcolm S Gerald & Associates, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David C. Stieglitz | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Represented By: | Eric Donald Coleman |
| Represented By: | Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis |
| Represented By: | Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
