MC Machinery Systems, Inc. v. Modern Mold Corporation
Plaintiff: MC Machinery Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Modern Mold Corporation
Case Number: 1:2020cv01365
Filed: February 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Robert M Dow
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2020 Filing 18 REPLY by MC Machinery Systems, Inc. to response in opposition to motion, #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Krammer, Rein)
April 5, 2020 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing set for 4/7/2020 is reset to 5/6/2020 at 9:30 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least three days prior to the initial status and all further status hearings. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff's motion for TRO and preliminary injunction #7 remains under advisement. The Court reiterates that Plaintiff may file a reply at any time and if Plaintiff does not wish to file a reply, Plaintiff may file on the docket a notice to that effect and the Court will issue a ruling by mail. Mailed notice (cdh, )
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket6, )
March 18, 2020 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Plaintiff's motion for TRO and preliminary injunction #7 is taken under advisement. Given that Defendant has filed a response #13 , Plaintiff may file a reply. Because of the COVID-19 restrictions, the Court will not set a deadline, but will review the reply brief when it is filed. If Plaintiff does not wish to file a reply and prefers that the motion be ruled on based on the existing briefing, Plaintiff may file on the docket a notice to that effect. The Court will issue a ruling by mail. Mailed notice (cdh, )
March 17, 2020 Filing 13 RESPONSE by Modern Mold Corporationin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff MC Machinery Systems, Inc. for temporary restraining order MOTION by Plaintiff MC Machinery Systems, Inc. for preliminary injunction #7 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Illes, Trevor)
March 17, 2020 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Modern Mold Corporation by Trevor J Illes (Illes, Trevor)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (ecw, )
March 9, 2020 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MC Machinery Systems, Inc. as to Modern Mold Corporation on 3/3/2020, answer due 3/24/2020. (Krammer, Rein)
February 27, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, )
February 26, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Rein F. Krammer for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, motion for preliminary injunction #7 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 3/18/2020 at 09:15 AM. (Krammer, Rein)
February 26, 2020 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM by MC Machinery Systems, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order, motion for preliminary injunction #7 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Krammer, Rein)
February 26, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff MC Machinery Systems, Inc. for temporary restraining order , MOTION by Plaintiff MC Machinery Systems, Inc. for preliminary injunction (Krammer, Rein)
February 26, 2020 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 4/7/2020 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the Courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least three days prior to the initial status and all further status hearings. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, )
February 26, 2020 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Modern Mold Corporation (dxb, )
February 25, 2020 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MC Machinery Systems, Inc. by Yeoeun Yoon (Yoon, Yeoeun)
February 25, 2020 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by MC Machinery Systems, Inc. (Krammer, Rein)
February 25, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MC Machinery Systems, Inc. by Rein F. Krammer (Krammer, Rein)
February 25, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Krammer, Rein)
February 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by MC Machinery Systems, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16763191. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Krammer, Rein)
February 25, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MC Machinery Systems, Inc. v. Modern Mold Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MC Machinery Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Yeoeun Yoon
Represented By: Rein F. Krammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Modern Mold Corporation
Represented By: Trevor J Illes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?