Luczynski v. Saul
| Andrew M. Luczynski |
| Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2020cv01609 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Young B Kim |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020: Mailed notice. (docket9, )
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government is directed to file the administrative record by June 1, 2020. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by August 3, 2020. The government's response and/or cross- motion for summary judgment is due by October 5, 2020. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, he may file a reply brief by October 19, 2020, but one is not required. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. Mailed notice (ma,)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 4/23/2020.(rp, )
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Przywara, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 7
DESIGNATION of Kathleen M. Przywara as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Przywara, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket8, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (tg, )
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The parties should promptly consult with each other on the following topics: 1) Agree to file consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge; 2) Do the parties agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner? 3) If not, motions for summary judgment shall be briefed as follows: motion for summary judgment shall be filed within 60 days of the filing of the answer and administrative record. Response is due 45 days thereafter. Reply, if any, is due 14 days thereafter. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Andrew M. Luczynski by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Andrew M. Luczynski; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16799749. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luczynski v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew M. Luczynski | |
| Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Kathleen M. Przywara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
