Homkes v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
Rebecca Homkes |
United Airlines, Inc. and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. |
1:2020cv01998 |
March 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Airplane |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 United Airlines, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint by United Airlines, Inc.(Ajello, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants United Airlines Holdings, Inc., United Airlines, Inc. by Nicholas Ajello (Ajello, Nicholas) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants United Airlines Holdings, Inc., United Airlines, Inc. by Michael Gerard McQuillen (McQuillen, Michael) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants United Airlines Holdings, Inc., United Airlines, Inc. by Paula LoMonaco Wegman (Wegman, Paula) |
Filing 7 ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020: Mailed notice. (docket8, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants United Airlines Holdings, Inc., United Airlines, Inc. (ng, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket12, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status hearing is set for June 11, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. At least two weeks before the hearing, the parties must discuss settlement in good faith, and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. The parties also must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court before the initial status hearing. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) by June 8, 2020. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. Second, the parties must submit a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Please note that the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report on the Court's docket, but must email (i.e., not file on the docket) the proposed Scheduling Order to the Court's proposed order inbox. The initial status hearing will be the scheduling conference contemplated by Rule 16(b). Lead counsel for the parties must participate in the initial status conference. Counsel must be prepared to discuss the status of settlement, as well as the proposed discovery plan. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process by one week before the initial status hearing, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status hearing. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rebecca Homkes by Austin William Bartlett (Bartlett, Austin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bartlett, Austin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rebecca Homkes; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16878491.(Bartlett, Austin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.