Alshareef v. Cuccinelli et al
Mouhammad Rami Alshareef |
Kenneth Cuccinelli and Kenneth Madsen |
1:2020cv02548 |
April 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John F Kness |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mouhammad Rami Alshareef by Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure (Mcclure, Lauren) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mcclure, Lauren) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Mouhammad Rami Alshareef; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16955831.(Mcclure, Lauren) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kenneth Madsen, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ng, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (txl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020: Mailed notice (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.