Federal Warehouse Company et al v. Arch Insurance Company
Federal/Whalen Moving & Storage, LLC and Federal Warehouse Company |
Arch Insurance Company |
1:2020cv02604 |
April 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Joan B Gottschall |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Federal/Whalen Moving & Storage, LLC (Aramanda, John) |
Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Federal Warehouse Company (Aramanda, John) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Federal Warehouse Company, Federal/Whalen Moving & Storage, LLC by John Anthony Aramanda (Aramanda, John) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Federal Warehouse Company, Federal/Whalen Moving & Storage, LLC by Paul L. Langer (Langer, Paul) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Langer, Paul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Federal Warehouse Company, Federal/Whalen Moving & Storage, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16974062.(Langer, Paul) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Arch Insurance Company. (ng, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.