Torres v. North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern et al
| Juan Torres |
| Jim Heflin and North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern |
| 1:2020cv03033 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal, the dismissal of this case is now with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ca, ) |
| Filing 39 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 38 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The Court is informed that the parties have reached a settlement and request additional time to execute the terms. To allow the parties time to do so, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The dismissal shall become with prejudice in 28 days with each side to bear its own costs and fees. Either side can seek to reinstate the case prior to that time. Civil case terminated. (ca, ) |
| Filing 37 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Juan Torres (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 36 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The Court has reviewed the status report. As requested by the parties, the fact discovery deadline will be extended 30 days until 6/30/21. The parties are ordered to submit a joint status report on 7/2/21. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e.g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (yt) |
| Filing 35 STATUS Report Joint by Juan Torres (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The Court has reviewed the status report. The parties' request to extend the fact discovery deadline to 5/31/21 is granted. The Court orders the parties to file a joint written status report by 4/18/21. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 33 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Juan Torres (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 32 AGREED Confidentiality Order Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 1/11/21.Mailed notice(ca, ) |
| Filing 31 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Agreed motion for entry of a protective order #29 is granted. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 30 AGREED NOTICE of Motion by Allie Burnet for presentment of motion for protective order #29 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 1/12/2021 at 09:00 AM. (Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 29 MOTION by Defendants Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern for protective order AGREED (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order (redlined), #2 Text of Proposed Order (clean))(Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The Court has reviewed the status report. The Court orders the parties to file a joint written status report by 2/11/21. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 27 STATUS Report JOINT STATUS REPORT by Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern (Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status hearing held on 10/8/20. Initial written discovery requests are to be served by 10/23/20; the deadline to amend the pleadings and join parties is 12/14/20. Fact discovery shall close on 3/31/21. Plaintiff is directed to provide Defendant with a written demand by 10/31/20; Defendant to provide a written response by 11/20/20. The Court orders the parties to file a joint written status report by 12/8/20. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 25 Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Mandatory Initial Disclosures by Juan Torres (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendants Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern. (Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendants' agreed motion for extension of time #21 is granted. The parties must now serve their responses to the Initial MIDP Requests by 10/5/20/. No appearance is required on the motion. The initial status hearing remains set for 10/8/20 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 22 AGREED NOTICE of Motion by Allie Burnet for presentment of extension of time #21 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/5/2020 at 09:15 AM. (Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 21 MOTION by Defendants Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern for extension of time to Serve Responses to MIDP Requests (AGREED) (Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern(Burnet, Allie) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendants have until 8/25/20 to file their answers or responsive pleadings. Status hearing set for 10/8/20 at 9:00 a.m. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 18 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Juan Torres (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern by Lori Ann Vanderlaan (Vanderlaan, Lori) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Jim Heflin, North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern by Allie Burnet (Burnet, Allie) |
Filing 15
ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk9, Docket)
|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Juan Torres. Jim Heflin waiver sent on 6/26/2020, answer due 8/25/2020. (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Juan Torres. North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern waiver sent on 6/26/2020, answer due 8/25/2020. (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant North Star Inn Corp., d/b/a Hopsmith Tavern. (acm, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Plaintiff is directed to make all reasonable efforts to effectuate service upon Defendants by 7/24/20. The parties are directed to file a joint status report on 8/15/20. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 11 STATUS Report by Juan Torres (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The Court orders the parties to file a joint status report by June 16, 2020. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall address: (1) the progress of discovery; (2) the status of briefing on any unresolved motions; (3) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule for the next 60 days; (4) for cases that have future court dates, an agreed revised schedule if the current schedule needs revision; (5) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (6) whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary in the immediate future, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Correction (rc, ) |
| Filing 8 ENTERED IN ERROR. (rc, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (rc, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juan Torres by Kimberly A. Hilton (Hilton, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juan Torres by Thalia Pacheco Argomaniz (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juan Torres by David J. Fish (Fish, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Juan Torres; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17034636. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit J. Torres Notice of Right to Sue)(Pacheco Argomaniz, Thalia) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) (sxb, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020 (rc, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
