Terry et al v. Village of Dixmoor et al
Sydney Reed and Ramon Terry |
Jose Villegas, Ronald Burge Jr. and Village of Dixmoor |
1:2020cv03345 |
June 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Ronald A Guzman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: In lieu of an initial status hearing, the Court directs the parties to, within 14 days of this order, confer to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. The parties shall also discuss deadlines for Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures and a proposed discovery plan. A written initial status report and proposed discovery plan shall be filed within 7 days of conferring as provided herein. Plaintiff is responsible for initiating such a meeting, and all lead counsel for all parties are required to participate. Failure or refusal to participate in such a meeting or to cooperate in the preparation of the written report may constitute a basis for sanctions. The Court will thereafter issue an order setting a discovery schedule. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ramon Terry as to All Defendants. (Bleifuss Prados, Adrian) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Ronald Burge Jr., Village of Dixmoor, Jose Villegas. (ng, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: In lieu of an initial status hearing, the Court directs the parties to, within 45 days of the filing of the complaint or within 14 days of this order if the 45-day time period has already elapsed, confer to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. The parties shall also discuss deadlines for Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures and a proposed discovery plan. A written initial status report and proposed discovery plan shall be filed within 7 days of conferring as provided herein. Plaintiff is responsible for initiating such a meeting, and all lead counsel for all parties are required to participate. Failure or refusal to participate in such a meeting or to cooperate in the preparation of the written report may constitute a basis for sanctions. The Court will thereafter issue an order setting a discovery schedule. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Sydney Reed, Ramon Terry by Richard J. Dvorak (Dvorak, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bleifuss Prados, Adrian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ramon Terry ; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17086352.(Bleifuss Prados, Adrian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.