Smith v. Grandvision USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mesha Smith
Defendant: For Eyes Optical Company of Coconut Grove, Inc., For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., Insight Optical Manufacturing, Inc. and Grandvision USA, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv03541
Filed: June 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2020 Filing 20 DEFENDANTS GRANDVISION USA., INC.'S AND FOR EYES OPTICAL CO. INC.'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF MESHA SMITH'S COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT ANSWER to Complaint by For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc.(Rudd, Jeffrey)
July 17, 2020 Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendants' unopposed motion for an enlargement of time within which to answer or otherwise plead #18 is granted. Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead by 8/3/20. Mailed notice. (dm, )
July 16, 2020 Filing 18 MOTION by Defendants For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc. for extension of time DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Rudd, Jeffrey)
July 16, 2020 Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc. by Katherine H. Oblak (Oblak, Katherine)
July 16, 2020 Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc. by Jeffrey L Rudd (Rudd, Jeffrey)
July 15, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE by Mesha Smith of Filing Consent to Join Forms (Attachments: #1 Consent to Join Forms)(Shavitz, Gregg)
July 13, 2020 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motions to appear pro hac vice by Gregg Shavitz, Camar Jones, and Alan Quiles #11 #12 #13 are granted. Counsel are reminded to become familiar with this court's local rules (including the rules requiring local counsel and describing this court's trial bar). Mailed notice. (dm, )
July 10, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17205274. (Quiles, Alan)
July 10, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17205145. (Jones, Camar)
July 10, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17204824. (Shavitz, Gregg)
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020: Mailed notice. (Clerk10, Docket)
July 8, 2020 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 8/31/20, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
July 1, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mesha Smith as to For Eyes Optical Co, Inc. on 6/30/2020, answer due 7/21/2020. (Werman, Douglas)
July 1, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mesha Smith as to Grandvision USA, Inc. on 6/30/2020, answer due 7/21/2020. (Werman, Douglas)
June 24, 2020 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff informed the court that, based on the original complaint, summonses were issued for Defendants For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., For Eyes Optical Company of Coconut Grove, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc., Insight Optical Manufacturing, Inc. On 6/18/20, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming only Defendants Grandvision USA, Inc., and For Eyes Optical Co, Inc. In light of the amended complaint, Defendants For Eyes Optical Company of Coconut Grove, Inc. and Insight Optical Manufacturing, Inc. (neither of which have been served) are dismissed and need not answer the amended complaint. Mailed notice. (dm, )
June 18, 2020 Filing 5 AMENDED complaint by Mesha Smith against For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc. and terminating For Eyes Optical Company of Coconut Grove, Inc. and Insight Optical Manufacturing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Werman, Douglas)
June 17, 2020 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mesha Smith by Maureen Ann Salas (Salas, Maureen)
June 17, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Mesha Smith by Douglas M. Werman (Werman, Douglas)
June 17, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Werman, Douglas)
June 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Collective Action Complaint) filed by Mesha Smith; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17118145. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Werman, Douglas)
June 17, 2020 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants For Eyes Optical Co, Inc., For Eyes Optical Company of Coconut Grove, Inc., Grandvision USA, Inc., Insight Optical Manufacturing, Inc. (ng, )
June 17, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Grandvision USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: For Eyes Optical Company of Coconut Grove, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: For Eyes Optical Co, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey L Rudd
Represented By: Katherine H. Oblak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Insight Optical Manufacturing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grandvision USA, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey L Rudd
Represented By: Katherine H. Oblak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mesha Smith
Represented By: Maureen Ann Salas
Represented By: Douglas M. Werman
Represented By: Alan L Quiles
Represented By: Gregg I. Shavitz
Represented By: Camar Ricardo Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?