Hornsby v. Saul
Cathy D Hornsby |
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul |
1:2020cv03934 |
July 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sheila M Finnegan |
Andrea R Wood |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #12 is granted. Defendant to file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's complaint by 11/3/2020.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Heffron, Scott) |
Filing 13 COMPLAINT filed by Cathy D Hornsby. (pj, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. This action (1) is neither frivolous nor malicious; (2) states a claim on which relief may be granted; and (3) seeks damages against a defendant who is not immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). See also Manning v. Arizona, No. 12 C 1019, 2012 WL 1161506, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2012). In addition, the facts set forth in Plaintiff's affidavit demonstrate that Plaintiff has met the burden of establishing indigence.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
![]() |
Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Brown, James) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Saul (Heffron, Scott) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Cathy D Hornsby for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Brown, James) |
![]() |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Plaintiff has filed a new civil case but has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The case may not proceed until Plaintiff's filling fee is resolved. Accordingly, by 7/22/2020, Plaintiff must either pay the full $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to take either of those actions by 7/22/2020 will result in this case being dismissed. Mailed notice. (dal, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cathy D Hornsby by James P. Brown (Brown, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Cathy D Hornsby; (Brown, James) Modified on 7/7/2020 (pj, ). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (exr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.