Bowman v. City of Chicago et al
Ian Andrew Bowman |
City of Chicago and Unknown Chicago Police Officers |
1:2020cv04155 |
July 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Matthew F Kennelly |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, this case is dismissed without prejudice. This will convert to a dismissal with prejudice on 11/4/2020, without the need for a further order by the Court, unless a motion seeking reinstatement is filed before that date. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Berrington, Marques) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ian Andrew Bowman. City of Chicago waiver sent on 7/18/2020, answer due 9/16/2020. (Kennedy, John) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Iris Y. Chavira (Chavira, Iris) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Marques Alan Berrington (Berrington, Marques) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kennedy, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ian Andrew Bowman; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17216341.(Kennedy, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.