Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Bullitt Mobile LLC
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| Bullitt Mobile LLC |
| 1:2020cv04218 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MAILED patent report with certified copy of minute order dated 7/28/2020 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. (Attachments: #1 certified order) (bg, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal #8 , this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 10/6/2020 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Bullitt Mobile LLC (cp, ) |
| Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that 20 CV 4218, Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Bullitt Mobile LLC, before the Hon. Sharon Johnson Coleman, has been identified for transfer to the Patent Case Pilot Program in which this Court is participating; therefore It is hereby ordered that 20 CV 4218, Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Bullitt Mobile LLC, is to be reassigned by lot to one of the district judges participating in the pilot program. Case reassigned to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow for all further proceedings. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/17/2020. (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The Clerk of Court is to arrange for this case to be transferred to the Patent Case Pilot Program. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. by Isaac Philip Rabicoff (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Patent Infringement filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17226191. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Bullitt Mobile LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Philip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bullitt Mobile LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
