Velez, Sr. v. City of Chicago et al
| Eduardo G. Velez, Sr. |
| Unknown and Unnamed Chicago Police Officers, Malta, Star No. 8221, City of Chicago, Cesar Kuri, Star No. 16202, Alejandro Sanchez, Star No. 2141, Ducar, Cesar Kuri, Malta, Brian McHale and Alejandro Sanchez |
| 1:2020cv04239 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #7 . Defendant's responsive pleading is due by 9/18/2020. The Court strikes the status date set for 9/17/2020 and resets it to 9/29/2020 at 9:30 a.m., with the initial status report due by 9/22/2020. Mailed notice (rj, )
|
|
Filing 8
Unopposed NOTICE of Motion by Emily Elizabeth Dory for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #7 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/2/2020 at 09:30 AM. (Dory, Emily)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead, unopposed (Dory, Emily)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Emily Elizabeth Dory (Dory, Emily)
|
|
Filing 5
FIRST AMENDED complaint by Eduardo G. Velez, Sr. against City of Chicago, Ducar, Cesar Kuri, Star No. 16202, Alejandro Sanchez, Star No. 2141, Unknown and Unnamed Chicago Police Officers, Brian McHale, Star No. 8721 and terminating Malta, Star No. 8221 (Fox, Edward)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial telephonic status conference in this matter is set for 9/17/2020 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 9/10/2020. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (866) 434-5269 and the access code is 8087837. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (rj, )
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Eduardo G. Velez, Sr. by Edward M. Fox (Fox, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Eduardo G. Velez, Sr.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17228477. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fox, Edward)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
