Barber v. Villarreal
Plaintiff: Gregory Barber and Gregory C. Barber
Defendant: Miguel Villarreal and Miguel A. Villarreal
Case Number: 1:2020cv04255
Filed: July 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Gary Feinerman
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1364
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2020 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for extension of time #7 is granted. The status hearing set for 9/22/2020 #6 is stricken and re-set for 10/20/2020 at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall file an initial joint status report by 10/13/2020. Pursuant to Civil Rule 4(m), the deadline for Plaintiff to serve summons is extended to 11/17/2020. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
September 16, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Gregory C. Barber for extension of time to file initial status report, to postpone initial status hearing, and for a 30-day extension of time to the Rule 4(m) deadline for serving process (Kennedy, John)
July 21, 2020 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The jurisdictional addendum #4 establishing, at least for pleading purposes, that the parties are diverse, the order to show cause #3 is discharged. The status hearing set for 8/11/2020 #3 is stricken. Initial status hearing set for 9/22/2020 at 9:30 a.m. Initial Status Report shall be filed by 9/15/2020. Please see Judge Feinerman's web page (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov) for details on the Initial Status Hearing and Initial Status Report. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
July 20, 2020 Filing 4 Jurisdictional Addendum by Gregory Barber alleging citizenship of each party pursuant to Court's July 20, 2020, minute order (Kennedy, John)
July 20, 2020 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:On the court's own motion, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The complaint premises jurisdiction on the diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. 1332, but it does not properly allege the citizenship of either party. Plaintiff may discharge the order by filing a Jurisdictional Addendum by 8/3/2020 that properly alleges the citizenship of each party. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal without prejudice of this suit for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Status hearing set for 8/11/2020 at 9:30 a.m. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
July 20, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kennedy, John)
July 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gregory Barber; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17231969.(Kennedy, John)
July 20, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber v. Villarreal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Barber
Represented By: John K. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory C. Barber
Represented By: John K. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel Villarreal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel A. Villarreal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?