Binns et al v. United Maintenance Company, Inc.
| Carlos Bardney, Will Binns and Michael Seidler |
| United Maintenance Company, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv04283 |
| July 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #16 . Response due by 10/1/2020. Reply due by 10/8/2020. Status hearing set for 10/19/2020 is reset for 11/19/2020 at 9:00 AM which will proceed via Teleconference. Prior to the conference call, Please click on this hyper link: https://teleconference.uc.att.com/ecm/?bp=4044432170&mac=2413900 to take you to Judge Kendall's telephone conference login. From there, join conference As Guest, ENTER YOUR NAME, Type the digits in the picture, Click on the Call Me option and fill in your phone number (no hypens) and NAME. If you do not have access to a computer Dial: (877)848-7030, the access code is: 2413900#. Given the increased volume of users that is anticipated, we ask that you keep your phone on mute until your case is called. Please also remember to SAY YOUR NAME EACH AND EVERY TIME BEFORE YOU SPEAK. If Parties have issues being heard or hearing, please log off and either call in or log back in. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 18 Motion to Dismiss NOTICE of Motion by Sheldon Leigh Jeter for presentment of (Jeter, Sheldon) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM by United Maintenance Company, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss #16 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Jeter, Sheldon) |
| Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant United Maintenance Company, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Jeter, Sheldon) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Maintenance Company, Inc. by Sheldon Leigh Jeter (Jeter, Sheldon) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #12 is granted. Answer shall be due by 9/14/2020. Motion hearing set for 8/13/2020 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Yee-ling Angela Lam for presentment of extension of time #12 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/13/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Lam, Yee-ling) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant United Maintenance Company, Inc. for extension of time Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Lam, Yee-ling) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Maintenance Company, Inc. by Yee-ling Angela Lam (Lam, Yee-ling) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Maintenance Company, Inc. by Martin K. LaPointe (LaPointe, Martin) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 10/16/202 at 9:00 a.m. The courtroom deputy will notify Parties if hearing wil proceed via Teleconference. Joint Status Report due by 10/13/2020. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carlos Bardney, Michael Seidler, Will Binns as to United Maintenance Company, Inc. on 7/23/2020, answer due 8/13/2020. (Dunn, Glen) |
| Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall for all further proceedings. Honorable Marvin E. Aspen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/22/2020.(mc, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant United Maintenance Company, Inc. (cp, ) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Carlos Bardney, Will Binns, Michael Seidler by Glen Joseph Dunn, Jr (Dunn, Glen) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Carlos Bardney, Will Binns, Michael Seidler by Jeffrey Grant Brown (Brown, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Carlos Bardney, Will Binns, Michael Seidler regarding complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue)(Brown, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Carlos Bardney, Michael Seidler, Will Binns; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17237715.(Brown, Jeffrey) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
