Poonja v. FitTrack LLC
Plaintiff: Asif J. Poonja
Defendant: FitTrack LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv04445
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Martha M Pacold
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2020 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's unopposed motion to enlarge time to file responsive pleading to plaintiff's class action complaint #12 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 10/5/2020. The Court will give the parties until 10/9/2020 to file the joint status report. (rao, )
September 23, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant FitTrack LLC for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Balfour, Ronald)
August 27, 2020 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's second unopposed motion to enlarge time to file responsive pleading to Plaintiff's class action complaint #10 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 9/25/2020. The parties are directed to file the joint initial status report by 10/6/2020. (rao, )
August 27, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant FitTrack LLC for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Balfour, Ronald)
August 3, 2020 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Asif J. Poonja by Eugene Y. Turin (Turin, Eugene)
August 3, 2020 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant FitTrack LLC by Eric L. Samore (Samore, Eric)
July 30, 2020 Filing 6 MAILED notice of removal letter to all counsel of record via email. (ph, )
July 30, 2020 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's first unopposed motion to enlarge time to file responsive pleading #4 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint by 9/4/2020. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 9/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, )
July 29, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION by Defendant FitTrack LLC for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Balfour, Ronald)
July 29, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant FitTrack LLC by Ronald David Balfour (Balfour, Ronald)
July 29, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Balfour, Ronald)
July 29, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2020CH04651) filed by FitTrack LLC Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17263386. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Balfour, Ronald)
July 29, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poonja v. FitTrack LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FitTrack LLC
Represented By: Ronald David Balfour
Represented By: Eric L. Samore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Asif J. Poonja
Represented By: Eugene Y. Turin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?