Poonja v. FitTrack LLC
| Asif J. Poonja |
| FitTrack LLC |
| 1:2020cv04445 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's unopposed motion to enlarge time to file responsive pleading to plaintiff's class action complaint #12 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 10/5/2020. The Court will give the parties until 10/9/2020 to file the joint status report. (rao, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant FitTrack LLC for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Balfour, Ronald) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's second unopposed motion to enlarge time to file responsive pleading to Plaintiff's class action complaint #10 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 9/25/2020. The parties are directed to file the joint initial status report by 10/6/2020. (rao, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant FitTrack LLC for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Balfour, Ronald) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Asif J. Poonja by Eugene Y. Turin (Turin, Eugene) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant FitTrack LLC by Eric L. Samore (Samore, Eric) |
| Filing 6 MAILED notice of removal letter to all counsel of record via email. (ph, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:Defendant's first unopposed motion to enlarge time to file responsive pleading #4 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint by 9/4/2020. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 9/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Defendant FitTrack LLC for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Balfour, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant FitTrack LLC by Ronald David Balfour (Balfour, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Balfour, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2020CH04651) filed by FitTrack LLC Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17263386. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Balfour, Ronald) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Poonja v. FitTrack LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FitTrack LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ronald David Balfour |
| Represented By: | Eric L. Samore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Asif J. Poonja | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Y. Turin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.