Boynton v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Julie Boynton
Defendant: Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Office Depot, Inc., Officemax North America, Inc., Officemax Incorporated, Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv04624
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Z Lee
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2020 Filing 31 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The Court has reviewed the status report. In accordance with the parties' request, the parties are to exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 10/15/20. Initial written discovery should be issued by 10/15/20. The deadline to amend pleadings and join parties is 1/28/21. The deadline for the competition of fact discovery is 2/28/21. The deadline for discovery into medical treaters is 6/30/21. The status hearing set for 10/8/20 is stricken. The parties indicate that they consent to proceed before the magistrate judge. If the parties wish to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes, they should submitted a completed consent form that can be found on the court's website or ask the courtroom deputy for a copy. The Court orders the parties to file a joint written status report by 12/14/20. The report, which shall be as concise as possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery, if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4) whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8) and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in-person hearing is necessary within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties' respective positions. Mailed notice (ca, )
October 2, 2020 Filing 30 NOTICE by Julie Boynton re stipulation of dismissal #29 of certain defendants (Buchanan, Lauren)
October 2, 2020 Filing 29 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Certain Defendants (Buchanan, Lauren)
October 2, 2020 Filing 28 NOTICE of Motion by Lauren A.d. Buchanan for presentment of motion to amend/correct #27 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/8/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Buchanan, Lauren)
October 2, 2020 Filing 27 MOTION by Plaintiff Julie Boynton to amend/correct and file First Amended Complaint (Buchanan, Lauren)
September 30, 2020 Filing 26 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendants Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC. (Derrig, Craig)
September 30, 2020 Filing 25 STATUS Report Parties' Joint Initial Status Report by Office Depot, Inc., Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. (Pozan, Kyle)
September 24, 2020 Filing 24 CERTIFICATE of Service of Rule 26(a) Disclosures by Lauren A.d. Buchanan on behalf of Julie Boynton (Buchanan, Lauren)
September 3, 2020 Filing 23 NOTICE by Julie Boynton re other #21 , other #22 of Filing of Answer to Affirmative Defenses (Buchanan, Lauren)
September 3, 2020 Filing 22 Answers to Affirmative Defenses of Office Depot, et. al. by Julie Boynton (Buchanan, Lauren)
September 3, 2020 Filing 21 Answer to Affirmative Defenses of Aramark, et. al. by Julie Boynton (Buchanan, Lauren)
August 28, 2020 Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Office Depot, Inc., Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. by Benjamin Michael Shrader (Shrader, Benjamin)
August 27, 2020 Filing 19 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Officemax North America, Inc. OfficeMax North America, Inc.'s Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Rule 7.1 and Notification as to Affiliates Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Pozan, Kyle)
August 27, 2020 Filing 18 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Officemax Incorporated OfficeMax Incorporated's Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Rule 7.1 and Notification as to Affiliates Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Pozan, Kyle)
August 27, 2020 Filing 17 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Office Depot, Inc. Office Depot, LLC (f/k/a Office Depot, Inc.)'s Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Rule 7.1 and Notification as to Affiliates Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Pozan, Kyle)
August 27, 2020 Filing 16 OfficeMax North America, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM by Officemax North America, Inc. against Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC . by Officemax North America, Inc.(Pozan, Kyle)
August 27, 2020 Filing 15 OfficeMax Incorporated's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM by Officemax Incorporated against Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC . by Officemax Incorporated(Pozan, Kyle)
August 27, 2020 Filing 14 Office Depot, LLC (f/k/a Office Depot, Inc.)'s ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM by Office Depot, Inc. against Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC . by Office Depot, Inc.(Pozan, Kyle)
August 27, 2020 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Office Depot, Inc., Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. by Steven Alan Hart (Hart, Steven)
August 27, 2020 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Office Depot, Inc., Officemax Incorporated, Officemax North America, Inc. by Kyle Pozan (Pozan, Kyle)
August 18, 2020 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Julie Boynton by Lauren A.d. Buchanan (Buchanan, Lauren)
August 7, 2020 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 10/8/20 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 10/1/20. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==Mailed notice (ca, )
August 7, 2020 Filing 8 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to counsel of record (pj, )
August 7, 2020 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC by Keith K. Ybanez (Ybanez, Keith)
August 6, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (Derrig, Craig)
August 6, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by Aramark Services, Inc.(Derrig, Craig)
August 6, 2020 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC and CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Derrig, Craig)
August 6, 2020 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC by Craig M Derrig (Derrig, Craig)
August 6, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Derrig, Craig)
August 6, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Kendall County, Illinois, case number (2020-L-000054) filed by Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17290523. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Plaintiff's Complaint at Law)(Derrig, Craig)
August 6, 2020 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boynton v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Represented By: Craig M Derrig
Represented By: Keith K. Ybanez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office Depot, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle Pozan
Represented By: Benjamin Michael Shrader
Represented By: Steven Alan Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officemax North America, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle Pozan
Represented By: Benjamin Michael Shrader
Represented By: Steven Alan Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officemax Incorporated
Represented By: Kyle Pozan
Represented By: Benjamin Michael Shrader
Represented By: Steven Alan Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Services, Inc.
Represented By: Craig M Derrig
Represented By: Keith K. Ybanez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Uniform Services (Midwest), LLC
Represented By: Craig M Derrig
Represented By: Keith K. Ybanez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Boynton
Represented By: Lauren A.d. Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?