Mrad v. Wolf et al
NAJI MRAD |
Thomas Cioppa, Director FBI Christopher A. Wray, Acting Director Chad Wolf, Mike Pompeo, Christopher A. Wray and Chad Wolf |
1:2020cv04632 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status hearing set for 10/19/20 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 10/12/20. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Plaintiff's motion to appoint expert and vacate judgment #6 is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that it seeks to vacate the Court's dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint #5 . The dismissal was entered in error, as Plaintiff has not filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. See notice of correction #4 . This case is hereby reinstated. But Plaintiff's motion is denied (without prejudice) to the extent that its docket entry asks to appoint an expert, which the motion itself does not do. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Naji Mrad to appoint expert , MOTION by Plaintiff Naji Mrad to vacate (Odeh, Reem) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal #3 , this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Correction regarding #3 (sxb, ) |
Filing 3 Entered in Error (Odeh, Reem) Modified on 8/7/2020 (sxb, ). |
SUMMONS Issued as to Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jn, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by NAJI MRAD ; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17291364. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Odeh, Reem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.