Aguilar v. Barnes et al
| Armando Martinez Aguilar |
| Onuoha Jude, John Does 1-4 and Nanette Barnes |
| 1:2020cv04661 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 TRANSFERRED to the District of South Carolina (Florence Division) the electronic record. (gcy, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The court transfers this action forthwith to the United States Court of South Carolina, Florence Division for whatever action the transferee court deems appropriate The Clerk shall not issue summonses unless the transferee court so directs. This case and all pending motions are terminated on this court's docket. Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 8/12/2020. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Armando Martinez Aguilar for attorney representation. (Envelope postmark date 8/3/20). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Armando Martinez Aguilar for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (Envelope postmark date 8/3/20). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Armando Martinez Aguilar. (Attachments). Envelope postmark date 8/3/20). (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
