Johnson et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
| Jon Johnson, Desmond Randolph, Kevin Johnson, Ravi Kumar, Rachel Stevens, Ali Nadzhafaliyeu and David Ostrowski |
| Sharon Coleman, Tom Zubik, Illinois Department of Human Services and Michelle Evans |
| 1:2020cv04763 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MAIL RETURNED, for document #4 , #3 , #1 , #2 , #5 sent to Jon Johnson returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received. (gw, ) |
| MAILED dismissed plaintiff's a copy of the order dated 9/15/2020 (mc, ) |
| MAILED Plaintiff an informa pauperis application, amended civil rights complaint form, a blank USM -285 form, and a copy of the order dated 9/15/2020. (mc, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER :Plaintiff's Nadzhafaliyeu [3) #5 and Stevens's #4 applications for leave to proceed informa pauperis are denied without prejudice. The complaint [I] is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of Court is directed to: (I) dismiss and terminate all Plaintiff's except Plaintiff Jon Johnson. without prejudice to the dismissed Plaintiff's initiating separate lawsuits as to their own experiences; (2) amend the docket to reflect that Jon Johnson is the sole Plaintiff; (3) turn off future notices to the dismissed Plaintiff's; (4) send Plaintiff Johnson an in.forma pauperis application, amended civil rights complaint form, a blank USM -285 form, and a copy of this order; and (5) send a copy of this order to all dismissed Plaintiff's. By 10/12/2020 if he wishes to proceed with this action individually, Plaintiff Jo n Johnson must: ( 1 ) address the filing fee by either: (a) prepaying $400 by check or money order payable to the Clerk of Court; or (b) submitting a complete in forma pauperis application; (2) submit an amended complaint on the Court"s required form; and (3) submit a completed USM-285 form for each Defendant. If he fails to comply with the foregoing directives by that date, this case will be summarily dismissed. If the dismissed Plaintiff's wish to proceed with any claim each must file a separate suit together with their own application to proceed informa pauperis. Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 9/15/2020.Mailed notice(mc, )
|
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 by Ali Nadzhafaliyeu. (pj, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Rachel Stevens for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pj, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ali Nadzhafaliyeu for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pj, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 8/8/2020)(pj, ) |
| Filing 6 Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020. Mailed notice. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
