Meeky v. City of Chicago et al
| Melvin Meeky |
| City of Chicago and Chicago Police Department |
| 1:2020cv04843 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice(mc, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER : For the reasons set forth below, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The status hearing set for 10/28/2020 #6 is stricken. Enter judgment order. This dismissal counts as a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Civil case closed. Signed by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 10/13/2020. Mailed notice(mc, )
|
| Filing 7 RECEIVED Amended Complaint under the constitution (Bivens Action) Title 28 section 1331 U.S. code (Federal Defendant) by Melvin Meeky. (Envelope postmarked 9/22/2020). (mc, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $12.83 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund officer at Cook County Jail and to this court's fiscal department. For the reasons set forth below, the complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must submit an amended complaint by 10/7/2020. Failure to comply will result in dismissal with prejudice of this lawsuit. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice because it does not reflect that he has made reasonable effort to obtain counsel on his own. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Russell v. Bukowski, 608 F. App'x 426, 428 (7th Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff an amended complaint form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. Status hearing set for 10/28/2020 at 9:50 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 9/9/2020. Mailed notice(mc, )
|
| MAILED Plaintiff an amended complaint form, filing instructions, and a copy of the order dated 9/9/2020. (mc, ) |
| EMAILED order dated 9/9/2020, #6 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail (mc, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Melvin Meeky for attorney assistance. (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Melvin Meeky for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachment) (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Melvin Meeky. (Envelope postmarked 8/13/2020) (lma, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020. Mailed notice. (lma, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
