Sutton v. Roosevelt University
| Daeja Sutton |
| Roosevelt University |
| 1:2020cv04902 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Daeja Sutton. Roosevelt University waiver sent on 10/5/2020, answer due 12/4/2020. (Ibey, Jason) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Motion by counsel for leave to appear pro hac vice #9 is granted. Mailed notice (dal, ) |
| Filing 10 Designation of Local Counsel By Jason Ibey Pursuant To Local Rule 83.15(b) by Daeja Sutton (Ibey, Jason) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-17528246. by Jason Alan Ibey (Ibey, Jason) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Plaintiff's motion to continue initial telephonic status conference #6 is granted. The initial telephonic conference set 101/22/2020 is stricken and reset for 12/8/2020 at 9:15 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (dal, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daeja Sutton by David B. Levin (Levin, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Daeja Sutton to continue Initial Telephonic Status Conference (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kazerounian, Seyed) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Daeja Sutton by Todd M Friedman (Friedman, Todd) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Roosevelt University (mp, ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status hearing set for 10/22/2020 at 9:00 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (dal, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Daeja Sutton; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17347506. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request)(Kazerounian, Seyed) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sutton v. Roosevelt University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roosevelt University | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daeja Sutton | |
| Represented By: | Seyed Abbas Kazerounian |
| Represented By: | David B. Levin |
| Represented By: | Jason A. Ibey |
| Represented By: | Todd M Friedman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
