Connor v. Saul
| Kika Lynn Connor |
| Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv04957 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Gabriel A Fuentes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record (doc. #11 ) is granted; no appearance on the motion is required. Defendant is given an extension of time for leave to file the electronic certified administrative record, as his answer to plaintiff's complaint, or to otherwise plead, pursuant to Local Rule 8.1 (b) by no later than 5:00 p.m. on or before 12/22/20. Please note that no oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. In the event the Commissioner might be contemplating a second 60-day extension of time to file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record, the grant of such a motion should not be presumed, and counsel for the Commissioner is requested to begin appropriate client communications now to ensure that a mechanism is in place to minimize delays in the transmittal of the record. Mailed notice. (jj, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Andrew Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding received complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Souza, Abraham) |
Filing 10
ORDER: The case has been reassigned to this Court on consent (doc. #9). Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. #4) is granted. In accordance with Local Rule 16.4, after the filing of the Administrative Record, the Court will set a briefing schedule. The parties are directed to review and comply with Judge Fuentes' standing orders for filing motions and/or proposed orders, which are available on Judge Fuentes' webpage located on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Signed by the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes on 10/8/2020: Mailed notice (rc, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING Case reassigned to the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Sara L. Ellis no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 10/06/2020. (rc, )
|
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Parsons, Lisa) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Abraham Judson Souza as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Saul (Souza, Abraham) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kika Lynn Connor by Thomas D. Yates (Yates, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kika Lynn Connor for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Parsons, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kika Lynn Connor by Lisa Beth Parsons (Parsons, Lisa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Parsons, Lisa) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Kika Lynn Connor (Parsons, Lisa) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
