Hankes et al v. Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc. et al
| Leanne Hankes and Janie Morrison |
| Ted Muersch, Ron Muersch, Sr., Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc. and Ron Muersch, Jr. |
| 1:2020cv04989 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for extension of time to file #15 is granted. Defendants are to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 11/9/2020. The 11/3/2020 status report deadline is vacated. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Joshua David Holleb for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply #15 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/27/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Holleb, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendants Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc., Ted Muersch, Ron Muersch, Jr., Ron Muersch, Sr. for extension of time to file response/reply (Holleb, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc., Ted Muersch, Ron Muersch, Jr., Ron Muersch, Sr. by Michael Adam Paull (Paull, Michael) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc., Ted Muersch, Ron Muersch, Jr., Ron Muersch, Sr. by Brian Scott Schwartz (Schwartz, Brian) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc., Ted Muersch, Ron Muersch, Jr., Ron Muersch, Sr. by Joshua David Holleb (Holleb, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison. Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc. waiver sent on 8/25/2020, answer due 10/26/2020; Ted Muersch waiver sent on 8/25/2020, answer due 10/26/2020; Ron Muersch, Jr. waiver sent on 8/25/2020, answer due 10/26/2020; Ron Muersch, Sr. waiver sent on 8/25/2020, answer due 10/26/2020. (Cotiguala, Jac) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison Notice of Filing Notice of Consent (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent)(Cotiguala, Jac) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: A joint status report is to be filed by 11/3/2020. Instructions may be found on Judge Durkin's webpage under new and reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison by Ryan F Stephan (Stephan, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison by James B. Zouras (Zouras, James) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison by Anna Ceragioli (Ceragioli, Anna) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs Notice of Filing Notices of Consent (Attachments: #1 Notices of Consent)(Cotiguala, Jac) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison by Jac A. Cotiguala (Cotiguala, Jac) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cotiguala, Jac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Leanne Hankes, Janie Morrison; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17359070. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Group Exhibit 1)(Cotiguala, Jac) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Krapils, The Great Steak, Inc., Ted Muersch, Ron Muersch, Jr., Ron Muersch, Sr. (mp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
