Christensen v. Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC
| Jennie Christensen |
| Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC |
| 1:2020cv05051 |
| August 27, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion to dismiss #8 is due 10/30/20. Defendant's reply due 11/20/20. The court will rule by mail. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 (Oh, James) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC (Oh, James) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #6 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead by 10/1/20. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead (Agreed) (Oh, James) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC by James J. Oh (Oh, James) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 11/10/20, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennie Christensen as to Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC on 8/31/2020, answer due 9/21/2020. (Patricoski, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jennie Christensen; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17369305. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit EEOC Right to Sue)(Patricoski, Gregory) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Christensen v. Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jennie Christensen | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Andrew Patricoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC | |
| Represented By: | James J. Oh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
