UNITE HERE Local 1 v. Ruprecht Company
| UNITE HERE Local 1 |
| Ruprecht Company |
| 1:2020cv05158 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file answer #9 is granted. Responsive pleading is due 11/4/20. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION by Defendant Ruprecht Company for extension of time to file answer regarding amended complaint #3 (Unopposed) (Kaplan, Alan)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ruprecht Company by Jiwon Juliana Yhee (Yhee, Jiwon)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ruprecht Company by Alan Michael Kaplan (Kaplan, Alan)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 11/16/20, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by UNITE HERE Local 1 as to Ruprecht Company on 9/14/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. served on Joseph A. Macaluso on 9/14/2020 (Clark, Amanda) (Docket text modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 9/16/2020 (bg, ).
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff UNITE HERE Local 1 by Amanda R. Clark (Clark, Amanda)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ruprecht Company. (acm, )
|
|
Filing 3
First AMENDED complaint by UNITE HERE Local 1 against Ruprecht Company (Angelucci, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT and Petition to Compel Arbitration filed by UNITE HERE Local 1; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17385276. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Angelucci, Margaret)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNITE HERE Local 1 v. Ruprecht Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITE HERE Local 1 | |
| Represented By: | Margaret Ann Angelucci |
| Represented By: | Amanda R. Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ruprecht Company | |
| Represented By: | Jiwon Juliana Yhee |
| Represented By: | Alan Michael Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
