Goetz v. Hiller
Ignatius Goetz |
Dale Hiller |
1:2020cv05167 |
September 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Susan E Cox |
Mary M Rowland |
P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY by Dale Hiller to response in opposition to motion, #9 in support of his motion to dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Correspondence between Defendant and Counsel for Plaintiff)(Cohn, Ari) |
Filing 16 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case to the Honorable Susan E. Cox, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Susan E. Cox on 10/26/2020. (rc, ) |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ignatius Goetz by Joseph J. Miroballi (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Miroballi, Joseph) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ignatius Goetz by Joseph J. Miroballi (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Miroballi, Joseph) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ignatius Goetz by Joseph J. Miroballi and Michael R. Riss (Attachments: #1 Appearance, #2 Certificate of Service)(Miroballi, Joseph) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Local Rule 83.16 requires every lawyer who represents a party to file an appearance form. Failure to do so can lead to sanctions. LR 83.16(e). Joseph Miroballi and Michael Riss of MDR Law LLC have filed pleadings on behalf of the plaintiff in this case. [Dkt. 9, 10]. But these lawyers have not filed an appearance in this matter despite the court ordering them to do so. [Dkt. 11]. Counsel are ordered to file their appearance by 10/30/20. Failure to do so will result in sanctions, including striking the aforementioned pleadings. Defense counsel is required to send this order to plaintiff's counsel. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The court has reviewed the parties' joint initial status report. As stated in the report, parties unanimously consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. In order for the case to be reassigned, Plaintiff's counsel must file his appearance. He is ordered to do so by 10/20/20. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 10 STATUS Report Joint by Ignatius Goetz (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Miroballi, Joseph) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE by Ignatius Goetzin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Dale Hiller #5 , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Dale Hiller #4 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Miroballi, Joseph) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 10/19/20, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion to dismiss #4 #5 is due 10/9/20. Defendant's reply is due 10/30/20. The court will rule by mail. Defense counsel shall serve a copy of this order as service was done in the Notice filed on 9/9/20 #6 . Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Dale Hiller re MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Dale Hiller #5 (Cohn, Ari) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Dale Hiller (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Cohn, Ari) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Dale Hiller (Cohn, Ari) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dale Hiller by Ari Z. Cohn (Cohn, Ari) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cohn, Ari) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2020L007879) filed by Dale Hiller Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17387351. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Summons and State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B: Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C: Correspondence with Counsel for Plaintiff)(Cohn, Ari) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Goetz v. Hiller | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dale Hiller | |
Represented By: | Ari Z. Cohn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ignatius Goetz | |
Represented By: | Joseph J. Miroballi |
Represented By: | Michael R. Riss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.