Childs v. Saul
Eric Terrell Childs |
Andrew M. Saul |
1:2020cv05420 |
September 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Susan E Cox |
Manish S Shah |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been reassigned to Judge Cox. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 12/15/2020 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 2/15/2021. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 4/1/2021. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 4/15/2021. Mailed notice (np, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Susan E. Cox, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Manish S. Shah no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Manish S. Shah on 10/16/20.(aee, ) |
Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Feingold, Richard) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Virginia Ovitz Hancock as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Saul (Hancock, Virginia) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief shall be filed 60 days after the Administrative Record is filed on the court's docket. Defendant SSA's response shall be filed 45 days after the plaintiff's brief. Plaintiff's reply shall be filed 14 days thereafter. The court will issue a ruling via CM/ECF. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Eric Terrell Childs for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Feingold, Richard) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Eric Terrell Childs by Richard Isaac Feingold (Feingold, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Feingold, Richard) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Eric Terrell Childs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial)(Feingold, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Childs v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Represented By: | Virginia Ovitz Hancock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric Terrell Childs | |
Represented By: | Richard Isaac Feingold |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.