Bingenheimer v. Saul
| Carrie A. Bingenheimer |
| Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2020cv05465 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Susan E Cox |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been reassigned to Judge Cox. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 11/30/2020 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 1/29/2021. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 3/15/2021. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 3/29/2021. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Susan E. Cox, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable John Z. Lee no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 10/1/2020. (sxb, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The parties filed a joint consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case will be reassigned.Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Hartzler, Alex)
|
|
Filing 7
DESIGNATION of Alex Harms Hartzler as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Hartzler, Alex)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 granted. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 moot. Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the defendant is to file its answer and administrative record no later 11/16/20. Plaintiff's opening brief is due 12/14/20. Defendant's response brief is 1/11/21. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 1/25/20. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf. Telephone Conference set for 10/7/20 at 9:00 a.m. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. A joint status report is due by 10/2/20.Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Carrie A. Bingenheimer for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Amended In Forma Pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gw, )
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Carrie A. Bingenheimer for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Carrie A. Bingenheimer by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Carrie A. Bingenheimer; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bingenheimer v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul | |
| Represented By: | Alex Harms Hartzler |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carrie A. Bingenheimer | |
| Represented By: | Barry Alan Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
